Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/1998/02/09/07:56:24
Hans-Bernhard Broeker wrote:
>
> On Sun, 8 Feb 1998, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > For me, ANSI compliance is the main concern. Anything else is
> > secondary to it. If the current version is not ANSI-compliant, IMHO
> > it should be fixed ASAP.
>
> > However, making untrivial changes with global consequences, such as
> > switching to unsigned char by default, just to make buggy code
> > magically turn correct is not my idea of a small change in a minor
> > release.
>
> As usual, Eli expressed my very thoughts in much clearer words than I did
> :-)
Even if the default was changed to "unsigned char" to current is*
macro's are still buggy.
I am about to write a new set of is* macro's under the assumption that
"signed char" will remain the default since I cannot hold my breath any
longer :-(
--
\ Vik /-_-_-_-_-_-_/
\___/ Heyndrickx /
\ /-_-_-_-_-_-_/
- Raw text -