Date:	Wed, 21 Jan 1998 15:05:52 +0100 (MET)
From:	Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
cc:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>, robert DOT hoehne AT gmx DOT net,
	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: gcc 2.8.0
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.980121154110.27671F-100000@is>
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.3.93.980121150254.2863K-100000@acp3bf>
MIME-Version:	1.0

On Wed, 21 Jan 1998, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> I think the issue of the stub coded inside Binutils vs the one in
> `stubify' should be resolved, before we can really claim that core
> DJGPP and GCC/Binutils are independent of each other.  The fact that
> the new Binutils can read the stub using an environment variable is a
> step in the right direction, but I don't think we should expect too
> many people to set up environment variables.

In other words: we should add the relevant env. variable to the
distributed djgpp.env, either in the general section, or in named sections
for each of the binutils that may write .exe files (strip, objcopy, ld.
any others?) 

Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de)
Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.

- Raw text -