delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Tue, 13 Jan 1998 16:23:53 +0200 (IST) |
From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
To: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
cc: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Request for comments: SIGQUIT in DJGPP v2.02 |
In-Reply-To: | <199801131321.IAA19548@delorie.com> |
Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.980113162023.6522A-100000@is> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
On Tue, 13 Jan 1998, DJ Delorie wrote: > I'm beginning to think that supporting SIGQUIT just isn't worth it. You cannot be serious. Since when do we yield to idiosyncrasies of MS platforms? Without at least some support, what's a person got to do when presented with a program that treats SIGINT and SIGQUIT differently (i.e. installs two different handlers for it)? Do we tell them to invent their own pseudo-signal mechanism by reading keys via BIOS? Seems like a major lossage to me.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |