Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/1997/10/07/08:35:30
On Mon, 6 Oct 1997, Molnar Laszlo wrote:
> As you could notice, command.com is now 22kbytes instead of 3 kbytes !!!
> Maybe it loaded its resident part into the memory? It seems that loading
> command.com high is a bad idea. AFAIK, QEMM can load command.com high,
> so this can be a problem with QEMM too, but I'm not sure.
I always have COMMAND.COM loaded HIGH (with QEMM) and never had any
problems whatsoever.
I also don't see how this problem with vc and COMMAND.COM is related
to CWSDPMI. For all I know, it could be a bug in vc.
- Raw text -