Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/1997/09/08/23:20:14
> Currently, the amount starts at 512 and doubles after each read (i.e.
> 512, 1k, 2k, 4k, 8k, etc). Should it quadruple instead?
> (512, 2k, 8k, 32k) That would get to the larger transfers faster, but
> be less optimal for some programs that fseek a lot.
I would probably quadruple, or even 8X (512, 4K, 32K).
> Also, I've changed the default transfer buffer size to 32k and stack
> size to 512k in stub.asm.
Be sure to document this as requiring additional memory to execute programs.
> Should we default to a max size (63.5K) transfer buffer now ?
I think it's excessive. It eats into the DOS memory left for other
programs, and I didn't see much improvement in data transfer speeds for
transfers over 32K on any system I tested.
- Raw text -