Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/1997/06/12/11:19:27
On Wed, 11 Jun 1997, Bill Currie wrote:
> As to why IO is slower with a `64k' buffer, that's easy... 64k in 16
> bits is 0 which is less than the 2k minimum, and so the transfer buffer
> size winds up being 2k instead of 64k.
Yes, that's easy, now that I'm aware of that. But try to explain this
one: several people have reported (it's even in the FAQ) that stubediting
ld.exe to 64KB makes linking *much* faster when the libraries are on a
networked drive.
- Raw text -