Date:	Thu, 3 Apr 1997 12:48:33 +0200 (METDST)
From:	Robert Hoehne <robert DOT hoehne AT Mathematik DOT TU-Chemnitz DOT DE>
To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Cc:	Douglas Rupp <rupp AT gmat DOT com>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: GDB and SIGALRM
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.970403073912.25849A-100000@is>
Message-Id:	<Pine.HPP.3.95q.970403123732.19260J-100000@newton.mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de>
Mime-Version:	1.0

On Thu, 3 Apr 1997, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> Roberth Hoehne has posted the necessary patches here in the past.
> Those patches are already incorporated into RHIDE and RHGDB, so if
> it's a one-shot job, you might as well just use RHGDB instead of
> downloading GDB sources and rebuilding it.

Oh no. I haven't posted the patch for the signal handling
here (only to you Eli), because it does not fix the
limitation that it is not possible debug programs
which generate and handle signals.

To clearify it: My patch was only made, because GDB
does not kill the program, when it it gets an signal
(except SIGTRAP). My patch was only ty tell GDB
(and then of course in RHIDE/RHGDB) to kill the
debugged program and not handling that signal.

The support for handling signals needs changes of
dgbcom.c (there they are disabled completetly becuase
of hooking the 'set_processor_exception' call).

And to Douglas in answering to you other mail here eplicit:

It is NOT possible (currently), to debug programs, which
uses signals. And I have not the time (and probably also
not the knowlage about all the signal stuff) to fix that
in DJGPP.

> DJ, is it hard to make djgpp-workers archives available for searching
> through the Web?  I understand that the mail gets accumulated, but I

This would be great. Until now I had to store all these
mails here for me locally (and I have a 50MB limit).

Robert

- Raw text -