Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/1997/01/22/11:29:08
On Wed, 22 Jan 1997, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> isn't it sufficient to distribute only the generated files?
>
>That is already done this way. But you might need a way to regenerate the
>Makefiles and config.h (e.g., if you add some functions to the library or
>the header files, like when testing a beta version of the next DJGPP
>release). Since many packages have multi-directory structure where the
>top-level Makefile invokes the sub-makes and sets variables which they
>use, it is not a good idea to tell people to edit the files manually.
That's right. But then, I think you can assume that if somebody modifies such
a package, they s/he will take care of d/loading the extra tools needed.
@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@
Who left the cap off the toothpaste tube, who forgot to flush the loo?
Leave your sweaty socks outside the door, don't walk accross my polished
floor, oh Judy! - PUNCH A JUDY [...]
Propping up a bar, family car, sweating out a mortgage as a balding clerk
World war three, suburbanshee, just slip her these pills an I'll be free
PUNCH A JUDY. Judy no more!
@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@* http://ananke.amu.edu.pl/~grendel *@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@
- Raw text -