Date:	Thu, 9 Jan 1997 07:26:20 -0500
Message-Id:	<199701091226.HAA02070@delorie.com>
From:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To:	fighteer AT cs DOT com
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<32D49E5D.165@cs.com> (fighteer@cs.com)
Subject:	Re: Patch for texinfo docs for _dosmem* functions

> In reference to my earlier post about the typos in the dosmem functions,
> I have fixed the error and made a patch for the appropriate libc .txh
> files.  It's real trivial, but I thought I'd save everybody else the
> trouble of doing it yourselves.  :)

Thanks!

> BTW, I didn't submit this as a bug report, due to its really trivial
> nature.  Is it appropriate to submit bug reports for documentation
> errors or not?

Since you know what to do about bugs, you don't need to report it.
The bug page seems to be used for people who don't know the solution,
or don't know about the workers list.  I also recommend submitting
bugs there if it's important for the general public to have a
workaround.

> P.S.:  I know I put multiple patches in one source file, but considering
> the size of the patches it's hardly a big deal.  If anybody has problems
> with this format please email me; it's is my first try at it.

Multiple bugs should go in multiple files.  This is one bug.  If you
had fixed a bug in printf() in the same diff, I would have complained.

- Raw text -