Message-ID:	<32614CC3.750E@cs.com>
Date:	Sun, 13 Oct 1996 13:10:43 -0700
From:	"John M. Aldrich" <fighteer AT cs DOT com>
Reply-To:	fighteer AT cs DOT com
Organization:	Three pounds of chaos and a pinch of salt
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: binutils 2.7 questions
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 961013130910 DOT 15837D-100000 AT is>

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 11 Oct 1996, John M. Aldrich wrote:
> 
> > How about just saying '-o foo' to get 'foo', and '-o foo.exe' to get
> > 'foo.exe'?  Why all the fuss?
> 
> AFAIK, this is how it works.  However, the dispute was about what's the
> default behavior when you don't say either.

Actually, it isn't, and you missed my point too.  :)

Unless the behavior has changed from v2.00 to v2.01, when you specify
'-o foo', you get _both_ foo and foo.exe which is stubified with the
default stub.  What I want is to get just foo, so I can stubify it with
my own stub or whatever.

Please, go back and read my post again.

-- 
John M. Aldrich <fighteer AT cs DOT com>                      

* Anything that happens, happens.
* Anything that, in happening, causes something else to happen,
  causes something else to happen.
* Anything that, in happening, causes itself to happen again, happens
  again.
* It doesn't necessarily do it in chronological order, though.
 
                                       --- Douglas Adams

- Raw text -