From:	sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id:	<9610031408.AA13391@clio.rice.edu>
Subject:	Re: `abort' in nested programs
To:	eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il (Eli Zaretskii)
Date:	Thu, 3 Oct 1996 09:08:31 -0600 (CDT)
Cc:	dj AT delorie DOT com, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.961003085139.27330B-100000@is> from "Eli Zaretskii" at Oct 3, 96 08:57:56 am

> Here are the necessary patches to make a call to `abort' safe in nested

These patches are basis V2.0 - and I know I sent DJ changes to crt0.s to
fix several problems.

> I understand that dpmiexcp is always linked in, so that shouldn't be a 
> problem.  Am I right on this?

Actually, this will break things like the TSR code, but I'm sort of used
to things breaking between releases anymore.

- Raw text -