Date:	Thu, 12 Sep 1996 16:46:31 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To:	Robert Hoehne <robert DOT hoehne AT mathematik DOT tu-chemnitz DOT de>
Cc:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: v2 alpha 960911
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.HPP.3.91.960912140951.8022A-100000@newton.mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de>
Message-Id:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.960912164427.16232A-100000@is>
Mime-Version:	1.0

On Thu, 12 Sep 1996, Robert Hoehne wrote:

> I would prefer it. But why 'unzip386.exe' and not 'unzip.exe'? The people,
> who use DJGPP must have a 386 or higher.

I can guess that the reason is to make the program name unique.  There 
are many other unZip clones, all of them go by the name `unzip'.  (For 
instance, Borland C used to come with one such.)

Of course, I don't care how the program will be called.  In fact, on my 
machine it is called `unzip.exe'.

- Raw text -