Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/1996/09/10/08:55:27
Date: | Tue, 10 Sep 1996 08:45:16 -0400
|
From: | dj (DJ Delorie)
|
Message-Id: | <199609101245.IAA21396@delorie.com>
|
To: | eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il
|
CC: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
|
In-reply-to: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.960910135140.10696H-100000@is> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Tue, 10 Sep 1996 14:03:05 +0200 (IST))
|
Subject: | Re: V2 alpha 980908 -- djdev and djlsr
|
> 1) DJGPP_MINOR on lib/specs is still 0, not 1.
Oops.
> 2) What about making libc_p.a (and maybe also libc_g.a) in a
> separate zip, so whoever needs them, could have them without rebuilding
> the entire library? Is that planned in the final release?
I have no plans for this.
> 3) bnu27b.zip is larger than 1.44MB. Isn't that a constraint? If
> not, maybe I should change the packaging of Emacs too (someone who tried
> it told me that for people who have a direct net connection, it's a pain
> in the lower back to download 8 files instead of 1 or 2).
I don't pay much attention to floppy size constraints these days.
I'll check that zip and see if there's anything I can do about it, but
if that's how big it is then that's where it stays. I'm hoping to set
up a CD-ROM distribution after this release, and none of our files are
bigger than 680 Mb.
However, you should continue to maintain separate zips for two reasons:
1) It might make sense to not download one of them if you don't need
those features.
2) Network failures make downloading really big files prone to
failure.
- Raw text -