Message-Id:	<9604041923.AA21912@gnu.mc.xerox.com>
To:	"Alexander V. Lukyanov" <lav AT video DOT yars DOT free DOT net>
Cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: scanf doubts
In-Reply-To:	Your message of "Wed, 03 Apr 1996 10:09:57 PST."
	<199604031809 DOT WAA29469 AT video DOT yars DOT free DOT net>
Mime-Version:	1.0
Date:	Thu, 4 Apr 1996 11:23:35 PST
From:	"Marty Leisner" <leisner AT sdsp DOT mc DOT xerox DOT com>

> 
> In some docs I've read that scanf returns EOF only in case it can
> read no characters at all. Is that correct? If so, the current
> doscan implementation is broken about it and I have to fix it.

Does this include blocking behavior?

I stay away from scanf, its often better to do

fgets(buffer)
sscanf(buffer,...)

and deal with stuff a line at a time...

scanf may well be broken, but I'll try not to find out.


-- 
marty
leisner AT sdsp DOT mc DOT xerox DOT com  
Member of the League for Programming Freedom

- Raw text -