X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Recipient:	dj AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
	s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
	mime-version; bh=cvGOtGL537BwSVAJZz/EUnWQA1/I8EKgF5iA+x2AK+g=; b=Ct2jc/3cabUw
	xx5TKTIdQGy+ap/xwqB9mJfyx6sgRpwob3Dc/3LarBHNtxC6DgY3T1rxflIQZvBm2Fq0j/h2RVCxt
	B7z1rzPMvGZeYQ4t+lox0HbjWxPGiKzvqpx/V9e5SQMojc/mV3V/V9gXhrwTV4mkDmn5MVkC5iERw
	1Ik5d/j7hiJpw7EM+sJ9pTtH2oP3hZLWqTpq5omkCm1xb3CibE7wzQxbx47wLS5DRz2KVFFHtc/vl
	BtTVkjIAWBSjRparkTXqgRDmmhfotivep99Rnjn1QnQDlDQJbqlEout8URDt72kp+87LFJ1qKyJdC
	3NlRGXYP2L9qIB7WIJ7HkA==;
Date:	Sun, 14 Apr 2024 14:46:02 +0300
Message-Id:	<86r0f8makl.fsf@gnu.org>
From:	"Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
To:	Pali <pali AT pali DOT im>
Cc:	dj AT delorie DOT com, sezeroz AT gmail DOT com, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<20240414104251.bjvvmf2qzvhus3ug@pali> (message from Pali on Sun,
	14 Apr 2024 12:42:51 +0200)
Subject:	Re: Error handling in __djgpp_set_page_attributes()
References:	<20240413120109 DOT bbs63syonlprvmw4 AT pali>
	<865xwlpio5 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<20240413122345 DOT sq2ua43ugmshrlhv AT pali>
	<86v84lntr7 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<20240413225744 DOT sxdwqpaipq5acj3n AT pali>
	<86h6g4o638 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<20240414082932 DOT pm4hht4c5agcysou AT pali>
	<861q78nuk3 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<20240414100331 DOT yv4eqcr2ruhfbslk AT pali>
	<86sezome63 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <20240414104251 DOT bjvvmf2qzvhus3ug AT pali>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 12:42:51 +0200
> From: Pali <pali AT pali DOT im>
> Cc: dj AT delorie DOT com, sezeroz AT gmail DOT com, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
> 
> What I think is important: include information that out_addr/num_bytes
> address range must belong to sbrk allocator. This is something hard to
> figure out without reading the source code of the function.

What other allocator there can be in DJGPP?  I thought all allocations
go through sbrk, isn't that so?

- Raw text -