delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp/2024/04/12/09:33:13

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Recipient: dj AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
mime-version; bh=lhPGP+y/NrQ+O0wiP7G42UCChSZbi15kdjtfU+Q486U=; b=NVeBKzlG12DW
6lmYaZRQoM293P6cVixaT1ANl5nDyvx4COCCkySRQVurYfb3dnzAdvEtbkcnTOu/ULjQtybckYCzy
STqjKk2xK2wzqpp9VM0l9qikFyI0iSDj5KcYcuwYUmO9R1Oetl9FTuUPNFfyaJhuuLePZrLpGbGOp
a0c+GNqCz8RVfi+hZTnT80qaktDGbwIavzI0+paGo3x6z8MqCuQk8pEWacw5z4HiedJVT9QmK8Qem
ptqhqQxhAMmsvqjLjgXQlVy8cyDp4wvh9dVs2fJCjLve/K+egq5ooSLbST/hHLJVSADsVxC7Qna9S
PdT9WoXHuuvk/j8oy50Rhw==;
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 16:32:40 +0300
Message-Id: <86h6g6so3r.fsf@gnu.org>
From: "Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
To: Pali <pali AT pali DOT im>
Cc: cwsdpmi AT earthlink DOT net, dj AT delorie DOT com, sezeroz AT gmail DOT com,
djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To: <20240404184844.manihh7yyr7ed7hv@pali> (message from Pali on Thu,
4 Apr 2024 20:48:44 +0200)
Subject: Re: Error handling of ECX in __dpmi_set_page_attributes()
References: <20240320231522 DOT fowijjlk2h6ilw6x AT pali>
<86o7b82gnq DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
<20240321175845 DOT shig623b45gtlfm5 AT pali> <20240404184844 DOT manihh7yyr7ed7hv AT pali>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 20:48:44 +0200
> From: Pali <pali AT pali DOT im>
> Cc: Charles Sandmann <cwsdpmi AT earthlink DOT net>, dj AT delorie DOT com,
> 	sezeroz AT gmail DOT com, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
> 
> On Thursday 21 March 2024 09:22:17 Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Should we at least check in the
> > function's code that the value in ECX is non-negative and smaller than
> > the value of ECX set by the caller?
> 
> That is a good idea. Here is an alternative change which does this check:

Thanks, installed.

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019