X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
	s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
	mime-version; bh=CBZuNS5i7eeNHGiCIIbv1TwzSK28fT/o45zDyA4ObjI=; b=lAZLyiwplQEQ
	BuZy/eQs81oRisuWQZJlRNsWUVaXnf9Lz38zGmSzB/lyeGdAb5EkMJPe/Fa3C7E1cj8VXpm3G9kEL
	9C2aLvvQ/anANZkZmmAP6pz14//YIT+oLKCBNoze2sqRDliAE/8hxUnyhDshpmqoHZaeEtFGWpw8k
	4MEddzMzgUZvgBcRWstVEu1omJa6Hq+EZPh4WKngB9CzMDo2OgaH2E/Y16TqoEHdZolml+8YwdjNC
	zkKeHf+nlWrz9XAnhVr5aDeQzZpN3pKQb5j4stX8P7z3mEVobE46myigF6bIibO0XtjHrhSDsaDry
	0G0lFqiP/o+50+g9wd0aSg==;
Date:	Sun, 25 Feb 2024 14:49:38 +0200
Message-Id:	<86y1b8wvx9.fsf@gnu.org>
From:	"Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
To:	Pali <pali AT pali DOT im>
Cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<20240225115526.mnx5jogkevlbjwu4@pali> (message from Pali on Sun,
	25 Feb 2024 12:55:26 +0100)
Subject:	Re: DJGPP documentation updates
References:	<20240213210641 DOT 52jnxonf3zuc2qxw AT pali>
	<CAA2C=vA9F0qL8vAw+FA5AtVavsEZqJKY=UrMz8MbpQa1POqjLA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<86mss3xfu9 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<20240217155210 DOT cs5mqv3izh5jlvee AT pali>
	<86eddbt6e3 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <20240225115526 DOT mnx5jogkevlbjwu4 AT pali>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2024 12:55:26 +0100
> From: Pali <pali AT pali DOT im>
> Cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
> 
> Hello, I have there another documentation change. It fixes mistake in
> __dpmi_map_conventional_memory_in_memory_block() function. This function
> takes linear address, not the physical one (as defined in DPMI 1.0 spec).

What exactly is the difference between a physical address below 1MB
and the linear address there?

- Raw text -