X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
	h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language
	:references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from
	:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
	bh=YxosDZWwIYT2+jAb8AFAQ1qqnXFXK2Fb2Taz2UrwyoE=;
	b=Mz9/+nuzDBXweWUMNmp3Cpr+534DWRdo9SslwaCe3VC39G7DM2khVfO6aD9VV3p4Df
	YONDkY3FYKvqTFNOtPPxGhMvfP/sMAxLciYKCKEu1XwERQwWgrNxymW71aXOhja7bmQ+
	fjWWm8iyiecgQMlFLI0jqK6eph9sg/Oe74USLJhu4damMe++XzHKciFm52yBeMxtabnr
	31AL0FbozL2jWuc9BhaUf1fr1V+kOErQdO4r9HKLZJWI6bg4gR5wpURvtWuGiwltCwvh
	ZG6jshu/chVTPfDWnYsbrlkcHFJD28as2Vbw7JPHY3B+ohctSh6nv6GgIX1XdI6/Djzj
	F2Hg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
	h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language
	:references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id
	:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
	bh=YxosDZWwIYT2+jAb8AFAQ1qqnXFXK2Fb2Taz2UrwyoE=;
	b=S4mZZuG+LihkO6CBMMtdKE8TKY3OLHvh0Fdmc2w3MgKWRENgZv/QAc9zMnyUmqpCI2
	3flC8PkMQFnCnkY/x4KdZCb4tsAg/8AzHAnzPnixooxMN+xYoSffZM8lm2qqB2kjRlCs
	1CMPP/SleLZbRNHeMU6zTIrhc4JgkIwRqsE0Y1NHgHDMoQVggV+5bul8F0Ehfb1LlBBX
	l7qcn5CPLwn/Ar7vFUyttYHmAIO2QsJJcJPTanjqk+dBIHKTSjIQViQ2Wux55ZSaMTju
	PDDz45ggrfmYXTv/9OrZbO3cV14lTHvM2gNjqcode9OSJwrypyVYI2fYT9vmSArF+yFx
	EK2Q==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AO0yUKV4yts7Uz9vlflSywsvW6rCEwshMmP3xxiygO0rGwIR1YNIqn6S
	np9+RWlky3rhtnrmicsfPriRz0y0c+kzgA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source:	AK7set97E7upmqOm/TwSS6NHjHs54n90RxgTh70SUX5HYXGDhrpa27RCCdpUMGW152ofKOs7VUr58Q==
X-Received:	by 2002:a17:906:5e47:b0:88d:ba89:1842 with SMTP id b7-20020a1709065e4700b0088dba891842mr1921719eju.19.1675276977243;
	Wed, 01 Feb 2023 10:42:57 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID:	<f021de99-7d35-9958-b3c6-fdc67a280f35@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 1 Feb 2023 19:42:56 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/102.6.1
Subject:	Re: [PATCH v3] dxe3gen: invoke ld/as via gcc
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
References:	<d67303fd-c302-82cc-bb0d-d1a21640d66f AT gmail DOT com>
	<CAA2C=vDYkF13NYPP_EXGMwzrjhLj2vEq68+-uYPfZOXpqWVRfQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83r0vd78cu DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<CAA2C=vCCYsgtbQ5wsgbS3S4G7N+H5zi5DxCyVZLSkEKrSpifMw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83o7qh74td DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<CAA2C=vDT10ZGfa3Mi2x0syvoT44Q3nfgcMfOwMZF=dM+ruL5OA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<b73813c5-0b91-6fa4-e4d2-55ddd97955a0 AT gmail DOT com>
	<CAA2C=vD5O16WsdfW9JqaDevTa2yqypD05fRFG+pW4T=3fq9SjA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83o7qg5hah DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<CAA2C=vCFR6pAv9pWurZRcnhy-ok1rp_c08m4TN5UJJd9dx1qEQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAA2C=vDGcOt1cnz9dnoV8neWxXN2S0anc=Pm4kBaV1LBjF3SNA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83fsbq12sz DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<CAA2C=vDpV-UPne1E8+46XkSPAgDR-GBsmPq2v+BoYXqOMJXfXQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
From:	"J.W. Jagersma (jwjagersma AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<CAA2C=vDpV-UPne1E8+46XkSPAgDR-GBsmPq2v+BoYXqOMJXfXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 2023-02-01 08:25, Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> On 2/1/23, Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]
> <djgpp AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>>> From: "Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]"
>>> <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
>>> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 23:17:13 +0300
>>>
>>>>>  If so, I'm okay with using GCC and documenting
>>>>> that 2.95 is no longer supported for this purpose.
>>>>
>>>> OK then, no objections from me. Feel free to apply the patch.
>>>
>>> Is JW's patch OK'ed? If it is, will you apply it or should I?
>>
>> Please apply, and thanks.
> 
> JW's patch is in the CVS now, after a re-diff and a minor edit.

Nice, thanks!  I see you cleaned up the allocation in main() a bit, this is
definitely a nicer solution.

Now, if anyone here could take the time to also look into the other two patches
I sent, I would highly appreciate it :)

- Raw text -