delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=20210112; | |
h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version | |
:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; | |
bh=sPFe+0y9PrKP/tMwbPe3tDjCVxlWtd+RrkBvdy3M80Q=; | |
b=qof/KOtRGqs+BSXLbcOJFLZlSmmlOVikBjiOgloXUVSbHvbNly579U9OHSslaHj4dw | |
AJkbTc/Zc9D5aIxk1cd5KN4RvY1P/sYwh8dG68+cPmCyD7518mBAqbt+F6JAWevvi5Cf | |
OAnTzK3BGc2wrwsd0hqqsEOlpoR+0Zvt/zZL+/w2YOxE3fmWdltDKjryxKavGOx/UCWJ | |
N6hPOWvVCboLu1lgPCx4NbpIl1rlyaq0hEz4s3fYqygZcCiRm67uqmXSvIKqszAjGy1y | |
RqNMhW1aDoHNvBPPnKdRc085+0p7lP7Qu/Vw/VEjCAYDSGJzR/Mv0cKc0iRmo17Xso7M | |
tQ8g== | |
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=1e100.net; s=20210112; | |
h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version | |
:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; | |
bh=sPFe+0y9PrKP/tMwbPe3tDjCVxlWtd+RrkBvdy3M80Q=; | |
b=NokVKnmdROh8Tqvvti0jMh1AaGVYZT4/yFrjpbpk8vczHpwq8RCN3iP8M2YzASvTbR | |
ReqxoZbiYY5VVkg+qWJ26TptaAZtWBUN/A3xzk7q1dH7GAgJfbUmNB3wE+dWMOkizEYi | |
8bZEKa1oKfaeaWGUscH7qaw+qBwATEt/xbdviNolX2I5Gn7pdVgljsvinp7VSJGV0Nfk | |
9dD6zk2OMpZ5FItI+7f9N9NALgMcNYIrmuWlbtnL/rtPwyNgGRhEPOcPDKxvaB8M4GTW | |
C8Ll6D3uBgP58+KT/ye21ViA6rxXPUmUFkt928e6Hfwe4yvPqx2RMHktqpPMBhT9rusb | |
pdYw== | |
X-Gm-Message-State: | AO0yUKV7qzhKb1jEEYUlEfqOuN3TAaYlKFJum8EazRNzCYE70ldR6EU9 |
/7TC+Di/4ooYqXdJeDR1yHtBpsPA7Y8q5IK3doeeJVtW | |
X-Google-Smtp-Source: | AK7set9kVQWEVv66GetbOTtE3CHIcDLaf1B8u9EAfBxXp77UVMV3mW7wuDes7IpnVK4q1AHt9e/XH3DITdLzfWuGdcM= |
X-Received: | by 2002:a5d:6348:0:b0:2bf:b77b:fafc with SMTP id |
b8-20020a5d6348000000b002bfb77bfafcmr9161wrw.475.1675196234044; Tue, 31 Jan | |
2023 12:17:14 -0800 (PST) | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <CAA2C=vCFR6pAv9pWurZRcnhy-ok1rp_c08m4TN5UJJd9dx1qEQ@mail.gmail.com> |
References: | <d67303fd-c302-82cc-bb0d-d1a21640d66f AT gmail DOT com> |
<CAA2C=vDYkF13NYPP_EXGMwzrjhLj2vEq68+-uYPfZOXpqWVRfQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<83r0vd78cu DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <CAA2C=vCCYsgtbQ5wsgbS3S4G7N+H5zi5DxCyVZLSkEKrSpifMw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<83o7qh74td DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <CAA2C=vDT10ZGfa3Mi2x0syvoT44Q3nfgcMfOwMZF=dM+ruL5OA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<b73813c5-0b91-6fa4-e4d2-55ddd97955a0 AT gmail DOT com> <CAA2C=vD5O16WsdfW9JqaDevTa2yqypD05fRFG+pW4T=3fq9SjA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<83o7qg5hah DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <CAA2C=vCFR6pAv9pWurZRcnhy-ok1rp_c08m4TN5UJJd9dx1qEQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
From: | "Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com> |
Date: | Tue, 31 Jan 2023 23:17:13 +0300 |
Message-ID: | <CAA2C=vDGcOt1cnz9dnoV8neWxXN2S0anc=Pm4kBaV1LBjF3SNA@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH v3] dxe3gen: invoke ld/as via gcc |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On 1/30/23, Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz AT gmail DOT com> wrote: > On 1/30/23, Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com] > <djgpp AT delorie DOT com> wrote: > >>> The only downside to your patch is that older gcc versions have a >>> problem handling -T on their command line, which is why I had gone >>> back. I don't have a solution for that, buit I honestly haven't >>> tried very much. >>> >>> Eli, DJ: What do you guys think? >> >> How serious is the issue with the linker script? Is that a problem >> only for GCC 2.95? > > As I had said, I only tested with gcc-3.4.6 (cross- under i686-linux) > and 2.95 (native under dosbox). Gcc versions 4.x and newer _should_ > be OK. Don't know how gcc 3.0.x, 3.1.x, 3.2.x, and 3.3.x behave. > > EDIT: I now tested 3.3.6 and 8.2.0, both cross- under i686-linux, and > they both work OK with JW's patch. I now do not know the behavior of > only gcc 3.0.x, 3.1.x and 3.2.x, and possibly they are not worth much > to worry about. > >> If so, I'm okay with using GCC and documenting >> that 2.95 is no longer supported for this purpose. > > OK then, no objections from me. Feel free to apply the patch. Is JW's patch OK'ed? If it is, will you apply it or should I?
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |