X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Difficulties compiling libc from repository using gcc 10.N.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
References:	<5FD1FEA1 DOT 7010304 AT gmx DOT de>
	<8816d501-9f33-4d68-4235-1935a83580f6 AT gmail DOT com>
	<CAA2C=vACivjbYiU7yVpyFdzKjjKB10E1tvqShLPQ6i31cuKrDA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<111383e4-b3db-f346-b71c-749dee17dc9e AT gmail DOT com>
	<CAA2C=vDL+YWHssNteT71jUNxYAJkxwiNXrKp1O618tY6bHHcxg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<831rfx4ixg DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <6371c322-a0ad-b85a-1ccc-1bdfff4a8d87 AT gmail DOT com>
From:	Richard Damon <Richard AT Damon-Family DOT org>
Message-ID:	<65b0c07f-88c1-1696-25ad-4c9a5c094159@Damon-Family.org>
Date:	Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:13:15 -0500
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.16; rv:78.0)
	Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.1
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<6371c322-a0ad-b85a-1ccc-1bdfff4a8d87@gmail.com>
X-Provags-ID:	V03:K1:tdSOR9cahjaCWE/q16FxgJlOuucvmx5NNmnV/24Ww3Yn7lL4jN3
	Dt6KbO9vEARFInRm9wtVRiO7l8eaDk0ZXKdVlNLfywWhLI5i84dyP6AKD+oE1lbKeFYtlFL
	i6V7xL5G+op7VMk8easmwnTKYvxGFnD9ycIsneo8JQPGsZel0WwtFBJ8eIGQblvpflhlM+R
	eRBg7cmI+doW7XXaXLDpA==
X-Spam-Flag:	NO
X-UI-Out-Filterresults:	notjunk:1;V03:K0:1tQ3zdPZyzA=:PgJfhFjWUdIOIzI7k8WzyN
	aDXMPjn4VIdfO4DJalWfrVCAdMu40a3lVB7IpYbFe/Z/cZT6yMY+emJmpQ4JnwVHoOpSbTZT/
	e732daQLSUDYAvF/VHLbNC2JMtbz3CG0pvGUHjoYVtnQno/QJLsyKvlTO+4FQESQ9u97zQN5X
	AVjtZEQ5bOUaCMfOHxm+FiHquBzoI16x0x+HFdtGFi9hu3bKzOjzjCSt6ri977joE65S7nRan
	fU9DT9Tg0pdZTEcD0QLKzQhOo3hDMf1ibM6xaRiTtyKTkiDW8+LYE7inFb5N4wJBcu5XfRNDT
	nu/a5+z3ay3iuSVeJwdyVG69tzjHxfBdXzhLMhLMIx9AKpEOVQVivdeYmT5mTcdY1lwyzCuWs
	Qq43+VimxHcIQZFLJCDPFFrnOAW/ZYD3BUatVUgAuWojoeqeh8cojJ2VkargpO97YGjW0ZHCA
	62f9pTpXLg==
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 12/10/20 1:55 PM, J.W. Jagersma (jwjagersma AT gmail DOT com) [via
djgpp AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> This only applies to global variables (and __stdio_cleanup_hook here is a
> function *pointer*), functions themselves still have implicit external linkage.
>
> I'm not a C language lawyer but this page suggests that it was always an error
> to omit 'extern' on global variable declarations.  It just wasn't reported as
> such, until now:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-10/porting_to.html

Yes, The C Standard explicitly states that if two Translation Units
define the same variable, it is undefined behavior.

A Translation Unit is considered to define (vs declare) a variable if it
is mentioned with the extern storage specifier.

Many programs have broken this rule, but gcc (and others) have covered
this issue with the -fcommon being assumed.

-- 
Richard Damon

- Raw text -