X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
	bh=jGJ0p699oVy3LcSRhb5SBly5V3Vu1X7tEpLbcd5JqPg=;
	b=BtWcnMzMvFuhiBs7G0T+zMg4+NhixIzOH+R0hSH6BpSweygh268DXnxnbKiQp86sm5
	gvXqFrz1jqZZQPZcuM83SMpNj9MvrcAVDlTaCJIjRj3CwuGLRBp7bkURiaXpPZ1AG1HF
	BtZb06z5bXwkr2VTGSY7d8MYI57BLiy7vUolsWScWzQ1dbDaa0agyc7YMBXi4kOwnwrf
	9criYr/PWLXp1Se5gqQLfyO1m0isk4fPtCSdRqLb7v04oFiUD2b1z7WDOi72yn079wR6
	j3WVbEFDJY2zHZadpJgSyW+HeSlRbt0FzvphcCBzst2kGMX+SpTH+G4hLTGpxPmQ4sdr
	GdcQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to;
	bh=jGJ0p699oVy3LcSRhb5SBly5V3Vu1X7tEpLbcd5JqPg=;
	b=BYxgFmLLTbynGrbEDcXlFEUc+gqwskqyH78aHnZLKhoANcWqPSSMirU2WPAuqpUB2i
	ZLhsBNU5RmA9C6vXJ+GBkULmfu05dAhI75uajfk0GZUjvswu+OunD3BICei2ZeeQtt/s
	6wCsb6Z1lzz2jXb0dnhV0e4+oeThTOEEKhovir1sDElTC+khsGMXn7W2wgIuJe2K7Fpd
	lR/zt0HCcaI1pVtYWnSgdxRtLuwwSXfonrznb0T7Gbm//yfeYgex6gJ7XzO4RoESzylz
	esQhv2918/HcrjBVqXMcF0BKkwWuEB6lCyn4y0vNpEJHItyl14g+0aECQcidnVfaV1kw
	WT3A==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AOAM530y/K7HbcnrUmJNSA7svPCmKOCBum6VqehBTLMz65SPLAvUBJUW
	hzZsqS8YcHkOnDp9oed2UVdOOWVNOYn3mO9/x133T2my
X-Google-Smtp-Source:	ABdhPJxhmA/94A/BHJz/q9hE50EUhJkMc52GF2kjO/pxGIawKLicHwI1jn+HwBgWCQFbEIYPfx+UcSWZQX3TheZdkdc=
X-Received:	by 2002:a54:400f:: with SMTP id x15mr5953177oie.38.1607617526059;
	Thu, 10 Dec 2020 08:25:26 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<5FD23272.1050309@gmx.de>
References:	<5FD1FEA1 DOT 7010304 AT gmx DOT de> <CAA2C=vA-5zfmD6G+5PERD4JtvLMO7utLNG4RUdb4BXokzKEQsA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<5FD23272 DOT 1050309 AT gmx DOT de>
From:	"Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Date:	Thu, 10 Dec 2020 19:25:25 +0300
Message-ID:	<CAA2C=vBbp1jtT1TQ8gbYv9gW=TaNhVM4LtYLBmuTHB9yeOa+sA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: Difficulties compiling libc from repository using gcc 10.N.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 12/10/20, Juan Manuel Guerrero (juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de) [via
djgpp AT delorie DOT com] <djgpp AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> Am 10.12.2020 12:55, schrieb Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com) [via
> djgpp AT delorie DOT com]:
>>> C:/DJGPP-2.05/BIN/make.exe -C common
>>> gcc ... -c dbgcom.c
>>> dbgcom.c: Assembler messages:
>>> dbgcom.c:1342: Error: symbol `.Ldoes_not_has_read_right' is already
>>> defined
>>> dbgcom.c:1346: Error: symbol `.Ldoes_not_has_write_right' is already
>>> defined
>> [...]
>>> I have tried this using gcc1010 and gcc1020.  Both fails.  If I use
>>> gcc920
>>> everything works fine.  In all cases bnu234b has been used and no other
>>> one
>>> has been tried.
>>
>> Some kind of gcc bug? How does the asm output of gcc look like?
>
> I have attached both assembly files, one produced by 9.2.0 and the other
> one
> produced by 10.2.0.  The offending code starts at 1337 where some asm code
> is
> inserted.  For some reason the labels used repeats a couple of times in the
> assembler output.

gcc-10 -S format changed? It's a pain to read and impossible to
diff against gcc-9 version.

Nevertheless, gcc-10 seems to have inlined invalid_sel_addr()
which has the asm, into read_sel_addr() hence the duplicated
labels.

- Raw text -