X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
	bh=GeSA3eNyOCz8Kc6cHSanGELr6ViyU9LIIIMPGEW2t2c=;
	b=AtxhG6WDi5ke+LygzNO83hAJne0MlbIQ92541nlzfANQZJV303lYGeKHE8oywOV5Z6
	p9L776dk+DzcTmq1EMV6PkddjSyvYJLdX9TA50viG4nYXmHl9Kze3XIJgUHmOkcwly5k
	IQ24tHL7HGCyfOl2E/MszDkkNMg9lcA/ZAZNVczgTL/P+mwWSUL2fw0YypZtbtipfqBb
	fk7FycQNEfU4ewPvs++n/28OscJfWd+EO4F93CmUi4biX1irFi7J0hs+HJcwfT58uu9K
	iXeGoJGFq5R3J5orW8zHyljKOK4HJql9rSUM1juhyuWGYwYvYkwp3ni3JlOgDvFm1pZd
	3YkQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to;
	bh=GeSA3eNyOCz8Kc6cHSanGELr6ViyU9LIIIMPGEW2t2c=;
	b=jeTDUcWWkdItG53LdfpC2VSkpvV31UrhtKhAbEAYemh1NFIlM6d7GYsFDFfIc8myJu
	DEUfhAOGmpC8E8v97WHG6zUDeBh3a/95HuKmKFw+efjw5g9maJDRgQJrA3C/7ohr3B76
	xExJ5kc+1T8luOoqCMjzjwWIlcwqUSKD/V2sXsY87mH600NP/2OwoYhWl0tcY3iTx7eh
	WJKHrHJWZ2CTPBrjcMTvTwpDTeVCw+PC9TDY1Nsr2+tAZUc/EgJB1dScD0Z0nUn3gJ14
	UFDrU+QfR+KhYW0RRhxHdlLJhNXPwKsmMiU/qnfmw9kXoyiLvzhiKDUNi2phmgcWHC1D
	cgog==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AKwxytdUb2lMP94F1MHW2duiaKvr7pkh9UXB2lkMeoE2F4MVmnZbkU8H
	61WaSnFQDGMh53o5KvSj/HNo0mNVixGlPELv8ADiEQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source:	AH8x225o5LJ4WmRhgzHQCX5XG5Q39IWRYrANMDakx/Xjwdww4mHG5tdyggVhcydP+L3lQxUCMk3tXvzO4qF/9iIHe1U=
X-Received:	by 10.200.17.153 with SMTP id d25mr14188527qtj.97.1517466119951;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2018 22:21:59 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<6abaf39f-c9f4-0fa0-50f0-21ab1b1d37b7@gmx.de>
References:	<CAA2C=vA37w2SnCO_ZTeUSM-oQYUnVeOi7baxgYtx2T1JOKDCvw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<6abaf39f-c9f4-0fa0-50f0-21ab1b1d37b7 AT gmx DOT de>
From:	"Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Date:	Thu, 1 Feb 2018 09:21:59 +0300
Message-ID:	<CAA2C=vD9ViZfMty0Meh0XNz0rJDYv=Lze0uzD08+5nhBKrv3zA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: Revert: "Prototypes of _doprnt, _doscan and _doscan_low moved to libc/doprsc.h"
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 2/1/18, Juan Manuel Guerrero (juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de) [via
djgpp AT delorie DOT com] <djgpp AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> No objections, but ther next time you decide to fix things this way
> please tell
>
> it here at the mailing list so other people do not waist their time doing

Sorry, but what are you talking about??


>
> pointless double work.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Juan M. Guerrero
>
>
> Am 31.01.2018 um 11:55 schrieb Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com) [via
> djgpp AT delorie DOT com]:
>> The attached patch reverts the changeset "Prototypes of _doprnt,
>> _doscan and _doscan_low moved to libc/doprsc.h"
>>
>> The rationale behind this changeset was a _doprnt() incompatibility
>> which had been added to binutils/bfd, but it has already been fixed:
>> http://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=8f314ad58ec824ce6c8467af29f11583f79a80ea
>>
>> Therefore, we don't need this change anymore. Besides, there can be
>> code out there expecting those protos in stdio.h..
>>
>> Objections?
>>
>> --
>> O.S.
>
>

- Raw text -