delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp/2017/01/31/10:00:09

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Received: by 10.129.74.11 with SMTP id x11mr8107723ywa.83.1485873672272;
Tue, 31 Jan 2017 06:41:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.157.36.193 with SMTP id z59mr1831082ota.1.1485873672227;
Tue, 31 Jan 2017 06:41:12 -0800 (PST)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 06:41:11 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAB9Rao95OA+ZimKVRCxv-frKREw-7Y=U=Uaxu11kVeUNDWxMCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=213.33.255.218;
posting-account=OFalZQoAAADCSVzPBKjmhdetJY5Tyv-s
NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.33.255.218
References: <54e4e15b-fb44-453a-9b1a-0c774a47b307 AT googlegroups DOT com>
<CAA2C=vA+Zj1+ZfG9hmzOxPugyti1Sv8wOrROavObqMiaQCeuAg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
<36a727e1-bebe-4332-9ac6-b52fc2d18ef3 AT googlegroups DOT com> <CAA2C=vBjDbEcwz8Ybe2kc0vN_yadJjhMFxg5k_CHKgj9crBNsQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
<6835ad4a-5978-42dc-8ccf-587040458abb AT googlegroups DOT com> <8c52ad4f-0846-4437-b88a-3d97f1df8091 AT googlegroups DOT com>
<CAB9Rao95OA+ZimKVRCxv-frKREw-7Y=U=Uaxu11kVeUNDWxMCQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <8b086a70-3a1c-4615-b1b6-4e017efd6154@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: micropython djgpp build
From: "multisosnooley AT gmail DOT com [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 14:41:12 +0000
Bytes: 6401
Lines: 83
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tuesday, January 31, 2017 at 4:54:20 PM UTC+3, Louis Santillan (lpsantil AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> Can you replace CFLAGS/LDFLAGS to exclude the `--gc-sections`?
> 
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 2:48 AM, multisosnooley AT gmail DOT com [via
> djgpp AT delorie DOT com] <djgpp AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> > On Thursday, January 26, 2017 at 3:13:00 AM UTC+3, multiso DOT  DOT  DOT  AT gmail DOT com wrote:
> >> On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 6:19:02 PM UTC+3, Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> >> > On 1/25/17, multisosnooley AT gmail DOT com [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]
> >> > <djgpp AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> >> > > On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 3:07:30 PM UTC+3, Ozkan Sezer
> >> > > (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> >> > >> On 1/25/17, multisosnooley AT gmail DOT com [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]
> >> > >> <djgpp AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> >> > >> > Hi!
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > We have a problem with building micropython with djgpp with
> >> > >> > '--gc-sections'
> >> > >> > flag active. It segfaults on linking.
> >> > >> > More info:
> >> > >> > https://github.com/micropython/micropython/issues/2560
> >> > >> > https://github.com/micropython/micropython/pull/2644
> >> > >> >
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Possibly related to this?
> >> > >> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20401
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Which binutils version are you using?
> >> > >
> >> > > I don't exactly now which version of binutils was used in previous cases,
> >> > > but right now newest available is
> >> > > http://www.delorie.com/pub/djgpp/deleted/v2gnu/bnu226sr3.zip and in bug you
> >> > > reference fix comes in 2.27, but it is not released yet. Or?
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > There is a djgpp port of 2.27:
> >> > http://www.delorie.com/pub/djgpp/current/v2gnu/bnu227s.zip
> >> > http://www.delorie.com/pub/djgpp/current/v2gnu/bnu227b.zip
> >> > Besides, the fix is (should be) applicable to 2.26 too.
> >> >
> >> > Looking at the links you provided:
> >> > https://github.com/micropython/micropython/issues/2560#issuecomment-260157891
> >> > mentions binutils 2.20.1.20100303: if that is version giving you the
> >> > segfault then I don't know, because but as far as I remember the
> >> > --gc-sections support for coff and pe targets began with
> >> > https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=0f088b2a
> >> > and that corresponds to either 2.25.1 or 2.26
> >>
> >> Just tested:
> >>
> >> [poh ~/tmp/upython]$ cat test.c
> >> int main () { return 0; }
> >> [poh ~/tmp/upython]$ djgpp-6.2.0/bin/i586-pc-msdosdjgpp-gcc -Wl,--gc-sections test.c
> >> collect2: fatal error: ld terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation fault], core dumped
> >> compilation terminated.
> >> [poh ~/tmp/upython]$ djgpp-6.2.0/bin/i586-pc-msdosdjgpp-gcc --version
> >> i586-pc-msdosdjgpp-gcc (GCC) 6.2.0
> >> Copyright (C) 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> >> This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
> >> warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
> >>
> >> [poh ~/tmp/upython]$ djgpp-6.2.0/bin/i586-pc-msdosdjgpp-ld --version
> >> GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.26.20160125
> >> Copyright (C) 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> >> This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of
> >> the GNU General Public License version 3 or (at your option) a later version.
> >> This program has absolutely no warranty.
> >>
> >> Will try to test with 2.27
> >
> > Unfortunately, building djgpp with 2.27s failed with:
> > ../bfd/.libs/libbfd.a(coff-go32.o): In function `coff_swap_scnhdr_in':
> > /home/broomrider/tmp/upython/build-djgpp/build/bnu227s/gnu/binutils-2.27/bfd/coffswap.h:775: undefined reference to `coff_64k_relocation_enabled'
> > ../bfd/.libs/libbfd.a(coff-go32.o): In function `coff_swap_scnhdr_out':
> > /home/broomrider/tmp/upython/build-djgpp/build/bnu227s/gnu/binutils-2.27/bfd/coffswap.h:815: undefined reference to `coff_64k_relocation_enabled'
> > ../bfd/.libs/libbfd.a(coff-go32.o): In function `coff_set_alignment_hook':
> > /home/broomrider/tmp/upython/build-djgpp/build/bnu227s/gnu/binutils-2.27/bfd/coffcode.h:1990: undefined reference to `coff_64k_relocation_enabled'
> > ../bfd/.libs/libbfd.a(coff-stgo32.o): In function `_bfd_go32_mkobject':
> > /home/broomrider/tmp/upython/build-djgpp/build/bnu227s/gnu/binutils-2.27/bfd/coff-stgo32.c:454: undefined reference to `coff_64k_relocation_enabled'
> >
> > I found this:
> > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.os.msdos.djgpp/mUOzbTpE1Sk/ODqAENwlAgAJ
> > But, as I realized, there is no solution right now.

You mean for test code? If I omit `--gc-sections` everything work as expected. The question is exactly about `--gc-sections` and why linker crashes. Probably binutils 2.27 will solve the problem, but I can't build it.

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019