X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2
Date:	Sat, 14 May 2016 10:52:47 +0300
Message-Id:	<837fex84a8.fsf@gnu.org>
From:	"Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<nh5gqc$kb2$1@usenet.news.interia.pl> (djgpp@delorie.com)
Subject:	Re: Fwd: A few DJGPP libc.a bugs
References:	<56F8295E DOT 2090401 AT posteo DOT de> <571E403D DOT 8080709 AT iki DOT fi> <571E4A50 DOT 3010806 AT iki DOT fi> <571E8166 DOT 1000103 AT gmx DOT de> <571EE412 DOT 6000005 AT iki DOT fi> <CAA-ihx914xS1qBNrR0Uii-jEm_-Q99LtbWHGmbjRj=azqidnaA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <152f7110-7932-a6db-30fd-afccd63822d4 AT iki DOT fi> <ngtd8c$vli$1 AT usenet DOT news DOT interia DOT pl> <83shxpavlp DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <nh09kj$s6h$1 AT usenet DOT news DOT interia DOT pl> <83zirvajs4 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <nh5gqc$kb2$1 AT usenet DOT news DOT interia DOT pl>
X-detected-operating-system:	by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From:	2001:4830:134:3::e
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: "Wiktor S. (wswiktorSP AT Mpoczta DOT fm) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
> Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 23:26:33 +0200
> 
> Because AX=7160h can no longer be trusted to return a short name, I see two 
> solutions:
> 
> A. like mentioned in previous posts, fallback to LFN if SFN call failed.
> B. parse the result of 7160h call and check if it is really a short name. 
> Use SFN or LFN call accordingly.

I guess A is good enough, and is faster.

Thanks for the testing and the analysis.

- Raw text -