X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to;
	bh=Ov0RF5z3f164JN1jAZBdzcHpeh5Qe+vMT1juR+G2blY=;
	b=lgizN9/S5Wsnp/ClF/u0cDdzvASVeuf0di5YS6o3fC8a8J+xMe+gfprd7Kz7XHH2N6
	jD+ZNkqigiuR03xc8Tbf+wLfhEn0ITThRyWXQKsVpmLFUodcseVMalOt5T2jtOrrhZ2K
	fTBrU3xm0E3p23Hgh7DEuW4l6cOhD1mUMYqDNg4YTFez6KOkIGGUmMTL/iJMGJkZ49BR
	1HWwq3KnpRtaeuBkfGCDl4kmyiwMFZWUjwOMOGPLFhihHlt6PkCojZMmQE340DuzzJjh
	ljGicM5otFrU65zfkF6Cn7gzrr7p+wx+46qBYZYdjd1+kfryZXzH8VFEtJ8B37j17mnl
	z8Xw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to;
	bh=Ov0RF5z3f164JN1jAZBdzcHpeh5Qe+vMT1juR+G2blY=;
	b=M1ezMt50S2EH8KfmfFLw9+dmNJJlUVKkI7LriBOYg3BsSNSdoFKmlIYhS7fZSjqMSX
	EbCn5CXeHwfz3fffOVFj0mjJ5vZFJDWUsCAVGGtAIOqGAkmN39g4i3q+zPiyOG8+f5Mj
	FfCL8/Ni9aiKvXCAv8j7O5ymGt3Y7GPHPtmmVYcCLw8gSS3ecR4XYtGkWV2vWkigwGCF
	pX403QV7l+HD/eTvPwtoWhWtbw6HaiGelMuPD2d+6h5biCd2+q0Ol4GE5Fyt/HjhFHTG
	3P96iOpfd0yEUTax5XHt3AA//GeJYowHH3ict8ei2EsKy/9+5YcqoYWywOvlAwZvfhSG
	X+hw==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AOPr4FWjPu6R+khS4uP+PRHl3+9cX7YJW8MR7CWYcdtgZpi3iUCxze/gFuXAFqA61ZG6CIkWa+YbzGvRoJQUDg==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.107.164.101 with SMTP id n98mr8937720ioe.93.1463079816515;
	Thu, 12 May 2016 12:03:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<nh09kj$s6h$1@usenet.news.interia.pl>
References:	<56F8295E DOT 2090401 AT posteo DOT de>
	<571E403D DOT 8080709 AT iki DOT fi>
	<571E4A50 DOT 3010806 AT iki DOT fi>
	<571E8166 DOT 1000103 AT gmx DOT de>
	<571EE412 DOT 6000005 AT iki DOT fi>
	<CAA-ihx914xS1qBNrR0Uii-jEm_-Q99LtbWHGmbjRj=azqidnaA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<152f7110-7932-a6db-30fd-afccd63822d4 AT iki DOT fi>
	<ngtd8c$vli$1 AT usenet DOT news DOT interia DOT pl>
	<83shxpavlp DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<nh09kj$s6h$1 AT usenet DOT news DOT interia DOT pl>
Date:	Thu, 12 May 2016 22:03:36 +0300
Message-ID:	<CAA2C=vAKytNqZa7qHVeRCzhGv1Wd9P3QSSPoP5H7RG=RzUbhAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: Fwd: A few DJGPP libc.a bugs
From:	"Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 5/11/16, Wiktor S. (wswiktorSP AT Mpoczta DOT fm) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]
<djgpp AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>> Also of interest is whether cat.exe is built with 2.05 and, if it is,
>> whether a version of cat.exe built with 2.03 fails or succeeds.
>
> The problem does NOT occur in cat.exe from deleted/v2gnu/txt20b.zip
> Only in newer version from current/v2gnu/txt20br2.zip
>

On 5/12/16, Wiktor S. (wswiktorSP AT Mpoczta DOT fm) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]
<djgpp AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>> Can you debug the libc functions involved and see which one of them
>> fails?
>
> fopen() fails because open() fails because _open() fails.
>

Since the old version does not fail, the problem must be introduced
possibly between 2.03 and 2.04, or possibly between 2.04 and 2.05.

2.04 added symlink and open-dir-as-fd funnies. 2.05 made changes
to how lfn functions are used. It would be interesting to test builds
made against original v2.04 from 2003: if that doesn't have the issue,
than the problem is introduced between 2.04 and 2.05 possibly by the
lfn changes by Juan.

--
O.S.

- Raw text -