delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
RazorGate-KAS: | Status: not_detected |
RazorGate-KAS: | Rate: 0 |
RazorGate-KAS: | Envelope from: |
RazorGate-KAS: | Version: 5.5.3 |
RazorGate-KAS: | LuaCore: 215 2015-05-29_17-31-22 |
60ae4a1b4d01d14f868b20a55aced8d7df7b2e28 | |
RazorGate-KAS: | Lua profiles 78662 [Jun 02 2015] |
RazorGate-KAS: | Method: none |
From: | "Andris Pavenis (andris DOT pavenis AT iki DOT fi) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com> |
Subject: | DJGPP and WIndows 10 32 bit |
To: | "DJGPP List (E-mail)" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com> |
Message-ID: | <57265177.1090701@iki.fi> |
Date: | Sun, 1 May 2016 21:56:55 +0300 |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 |
Thunderbird/38.7.1 | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
I found earlier that recent gcc DJGPP port versions get random preprocessor failures when run under Windows 10 (32 bit). The same does not seem to happen under Windows Vista Business SP2 (I remember having something similar when building for DJGPP v2.03 also under Vista, but it was rather long time ago). It is easy to blame Windows 10, but I'm almost sure that the problem is on our side. DJGPP v2.05 were used for all recent tests. gcc-3.4.6 and gcc-4.4.7 built with DJGPP is OK. One can bootstrap these version without any problems under Windows 10 later versions installed from binaries are not OK. Try compiling "Hello World" style program which uses <iostream> repeatedly under WIn10 to get random failures. I'm getting them in average once per hundred or several hundreds of compiles. In other test I only repeatedly run preprocessor and compared it outputs. So for further test gcc-4.4.7 were used as start version: Trying to bootstrap GCC: Tried earlier gcc-4.6.3 is I remember correctly and got failures in stage 3 Today tried gcc-7.0.0 20160427 (build it at first under Windows Vista without any problems). The results were very similar as what I remember from 4.6.3: - gcc-4.4.7 builds stage 1 without any problems - stage 1 compiler built with gcc-4.4.7 also works OK: no random failures detected - stage 2 compiler is getting random failures while per-processing sources (building stage2 libgcc, libstdc++ or in stage 3 depending on luck) That all points to one of following: - something with initialization in our startup code could be no more OK for recent GCC versions - something with binutils linker script (for example gcc.o has section .text.startup which is handled separately in Linux (I could try modify linker script, rebuild binutils and retry bootstrapping gcc). - something with new libgcc or libstdc++ (stage 1 compiler used one from gcc-4.4.7) I tried earlier to reproduce problems with stand-alone test programs with success. Now it seems that trying to reproduce them outside GCC is unlikely to succeed. One can of course ask why that happens under Win 10 not Vista. Maybe there are some slight differences that causes different behavior when there is some problem with undefined behavior. Andris
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |