X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<5706E3D9.9070401@gmx.de>
Date:	Fri, 08 Apr 2016 00:48:57 +0200
From:	"Juan Manuel Guerrero (juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101206 SUSE/3.1.7 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Different dup2 behaviour between DOS/DJGPP and posix.
References:	<5706CAFA DOT 1060201 AT gmx DOT de>
In-Reply-To:	<5706CAFA.1060201@gmx.de>
X-Provags-ID:	V03:K0:vqKEWkh7xXAkT7li71fBhd6isymKCqL9ucbMv3G71qaiMMYYzHH
	HbfTim29eRKpoi+pXcP7gw4SI6Yy+Ie4ZP8zm0RB4PtPbEM+rFXICXFJGMycswqz4NB/4vi
	Up6l/qXoXbzJ27zZAGUTIv+CpvrGEIsycx8U811ocmcAdT39xvISfl79f+JDYuaONSB6xkq
	6Zf1jkBhKEOJPOD+BkX+A==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults:	notjunk:1;V01:K0:lETEMqMvs6Q=:zJx1BhJf0l8j86tzc25CYb
	Ev16iWPeemZJyJyTnw53lNU/M/38LdQws//E8XHq4hj8Hy0tD/vZMAk/cbN7vSK9NNLjEYBMA
	zplSL/KPKpuDDGUGcdJjbuv9yHx1LXcfaVCZIjrRTeggwMaZG4IZ55kEk4iy2gFmRdneE6rMk
	DfPawEJW+tbVJc3yHV/v59ilHO81ThqTUQ6m4sJx40GuAt+JtdxUkwk+9K2vS7DYelDQIZKKX
	UDKhm7a3q5RqecLLgg8MopXhk3STNyQRxgfgrCUz6dI++iNu35DRJCBkN84fjgOuD41BUEU7C
	2me6wC3jzbnSYI4UFn2f/5tjOflTJSKf4Pt3gZFOkG+GIo8m7AlTmbJTTQpP0PYNM2zJsc55m
	QRhgi6RTeQm97K86G2bRbWtokHAQwpphsFrcDlQSnDfx4Uq2jCEHL+zDzwC9G9SMLWM82y8KX
	JT4PhyPIf+YDGtXSd67/vvOZYE9HFjPq676L2nlqx8ZpA+U8t0FM8qMi0yrQaaUrv594Mp3WL
	0ms7SG9OIF0tVytil3GyVo+E60pM0MB1alpRREnBX/a1eFw29/5Q4nV8F+kqTnl4snukipLEe
	VDqP9mfsDY7P+bqxL0eH4VbRvUG14QZMUjpxOTUiSdO9sVV7g3Koa1C7EpmXvc+KzPNYTEiQk
	w/B/bmxJCQkwm07idjSSli3SMUqIQ5DzQa5WxZZFEozXINIg0htxqlvx/E6qZW2QPgNl4YDwf
	288eO5MySdKxE2VQ8Gc0D7fGz1rIGuXY6F6xBCB8RB77sPToFFB5dgbDrEepXUtbScPSwa9SG
	wHUrBmw
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Am 07.04.2016 23:02, schrieb Juan Manuel Guerrero (juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]:
[snip]
> The question is why DOS/DJGPP allows to close STDIN and reopen it with FD 0
> meanwhile posix seems not to allow this. Is this behaviour expected?
> I have inspected the code of dup2 and the implementation seems OK.
>
> The consequence of this check is that Autoconf assumes that DJGPP's dup2
> implementaion does not work.


OK I think I have got it.  It is a bug in the DJGPP implementation of dup2.
According to http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/dup.html
The dup2() function shall fail if:

[EBADF]
     The fildes argument is not a valid open file descriptor or the argument fildes2 is negative or greater than or equal to {OPEN_MAX}.


The current implementation checks first if fd == newfd and if this is the case
it returns inmediatly with newfd.  Here some fix will be required because no one
of the 3 conditions are checked.  May be these error conditions were not in effect
in those days when dup2 was implemented.


Regards,
Juan M. Guerrero

- Raw text -