X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Received:	by 10.68.206.106 with SMTP id ln10mr12793312pbc.5.1443792613513;
	Fri, 02 Oct 2015 06:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received:	by 10.182.56.230 with SMTP id d6mr90732obq.9.1443792613473; Fri,
	02 Oct 2015 06:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Date:	Fri, 2 Oct 2015 06:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<952a68b4-223b-4222-b456-35514bb8b7eb@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To:	groups-abuse AT google DOT com
Injection-Info:	glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=208.123.184.66;
	posting-account=XGWx5woAAACFbFREYlembztJnxsJ2Of0
NNTP-Posting-Host:	208.123.184.66
References:	<CAA2C=vAwcH9pHN63=Mskr9L016yAAJ6KkMPeuO9o_2cV7Pd0Kw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAA2C=vDDN8UqGpbAzkba19Syq-1mLsBPAuSzSPWue_S2TYf_XQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<b8759e89-e375-4647-a9eb-64543cc49748 AT googlegroups DOT com> <CAA2C=vDSknbCKHzUA954weavLj16nXuDyP_Ggi+SmLJ_e-U_KA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAA2C=vAdzu+ebq1mEsoqwkxJcYR+2EZdKJ3d5XxOZRCytL6z8w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <952a68b4-223b-4222-b456-35514bb8b7eb AT googlegroups DOT com>
User-Agent:	G2/1.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
Message-ID:	<59c392f6-7577-47b6-be50-0d8d37bbec16@googlegroups.com>
Subject:	Re: dlclose not removing dependency dxes
From:	"emoaddict15 AT gmail DOT com [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Injection-Date:	Fri, 02 Oct 2015 13:30:13 +0000
Bytes:	2170
Lines:	9
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thursday, October 1, 2015 at 6:33:56 AM UTC-4, Juan Manuel Guerrero wrote:
> An inspection of your sample code and dldemo.cpp shows that it seems to be that it is the user's responsibility to explicitly dlclose every dlopen'ed modules.
> This is what an inspection of dldemo.cpp shows.
> This may not be what you expected from unix but I assume that no DJGPP developer has really promised that the behaviour would be identical to unix behaviour.
> Neither less I will inspect the issue during week-end but I do not promise that a fix will be possible.
> 
> Regards,
> Juan M. Guerrero

Thanks for looking into it.  We rely heavily on DXEs for our project! :)

- Raw text -