X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Received:	by 10.129.85.149 with SMTP id j143mr20429823ywb.31.1443469927066;
	Mon, 28 Sep 2015 12:52:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received:	by 10.182.120.74 with SMTP id la10mr70814obb.3.1443469927031; Mon,
	28 Sep 2015 12:52:07 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Date:	Mon, 28 Sep 2015 12:52:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<muc36e$t1p$1@usenet.news.interia.pl>
Complaints-To:	groups-abuse AT google DOT com
Injection-Info:	glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=78.42.224.28; posting-account=OsAajgoAAADdKJnkJkmhzqP0jo6I_P_0
NNTP-Posting-Host:	78.42.224.28
References:	<mu8em4$bas$1 AT usenet DOT news DOT interia DOT pl> <5607D4C3 DOT 4040800 AT gmx DOT de>
	<4b10ba83-055b-4ff9-bdd1-81b37c9aee36 AT googlegroups DOT com> <56083B83 DOT 6040707 AT iki DOT fi>
	<56086184 DOT 9070505 AT gmx DOT de> <muc36e$t1p$1 AT usenet DOT news DOT interia DOT pl>
User-Agent:	G2/1.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
Message-ID:	<0d606330-1db7-4f3f-ba6a-f711ab5960d5@googlegroups.com>
Subject:	Re: djgpp to Linux ARM cross binutils
From:	"Juan Manuel Guerrero (juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Injection-Date:	Mon, 28 Sep 2015 19:52:07 +0000
Bytes:	3392
Lines:	42
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Monday, September 28, 2015 at 9:08:01 PM UTC+2, Wiktor S. wrote:
> > The issue reported by user cannot be reproduced on any system where I
> > can check.
> > It may be a bash issue or a sed issue, but without accurate
> > knownledge about
> > the user's system it becomes impossible to reproduce and to debug.
> 
> I made a clean install of DJGPP from all the files you have listed, and 
> everything compiles.

Well, this is the most important outcome of the experiment to me. ;-)
It shows that it is possible build binutils from the distributed DJGPP port
for other people than me.  Neither less it remains a fact that it is necessary
to have some kind of Windows OS.  All my intents to use plain DOS (aka either
DOS 7 from Win98SE or MSDOS 6.22 or FreeDOS) have miserably failed.  The worst
seems to be FreeDOS but in the end they all fail and are useless.  Here a lot of work needs to be done if plain DOS shall still be of some use to compile contemporary GNU software.


> Although it does not work.
> 
> 'as' compiles a bit of ARM assembly, the resulting .o looks like an ELF, but 
> is not recognized by ld nor objdump.
> 
> perhaps this is a makefile or #ifdef problem and some wrong constants are 
> picked.
> 
> I won't have time to pursue this, at least for now.
> 
> "does not work due to bugs" is the outcome of the experiment :-)

IMHO this is not surprising.  Theoretically for every 2 systems A and B supported
by binutils it should be possible to create a cross-compilers but this implies continuous
support for both systems by the maintainers and/or users of them but this is certainly no
longer true for an archaic system like MSDOS/DJGPP.  We can consider our self fortunate
that they have still not dropped DJGPP support as they have done for other old systems.

Here you are alone.  I do not have access to an ARM system and I am not familiar at
all with it with ARM assembler.  I was really surprised that someone ever tried to
create a DJGPP-to-something cross-compiler at all.

Regards,
Juan M. Guerrero

- Raw text -