X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Received:	by 10.13.240.129 with SMTP id z123mr25623649ywe.13.1442431748359;
	Wed, 16 Sep 2015 12:29:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received:	by 10.182.241.67 with SMTP id wg3mr128438obc.15.1442431748294;
	Wed, 16 Sep 2015 12:29:08 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Date:	Wed, 16 Sep 2015 12:29:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<201509161849.t8GIne1A010595@delorie.com>
Complaints-To:	groups-abuse AT google DOT com
Injection-Info:	glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=46.5.89.220; posting-account=OsAajgoAAADdKJnkJkmhzqP0jo6I_P_0
NNTP-Posting-Host:	46.5.89.220
References:	<CAA2C=vCi88BYHh-yRXvtx8az13Y9wymqkjs93UJHx=qaZRPOGQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<cae6b037-4d08-4255-aa4f-d423a86a0d1c AT googlegroups DOT com> <83d1xi6ye1 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<CAA2C=vC4D8sm=3JMbLGAL-cPq7xAMZg32FCU0hezBrhkK9K9kA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<b27e79c8-8084-44f0-81c6-4487d88840c2 AT googlegroups DOT com> <201509161849 DOT t8GIne1A010595 AT delorie DOT com>
User-Agent:	G2/1.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
Message-ID:	<c6c5bb9c-34f0-4a8d-bcf5-9c13f8a0e068@googlegroups.com>
Subject:	Re: dlopen.c: make sure filename is not NULL and not empty
From:	"Juan Manuel Guerrero (juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Injection-Date:	Wed, 16 Sep 2015 19:29:08 +0000
Bytes:	2101
Lines:	15
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 8:49:45 PM UTC+2, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > When this has clarified we will need a new djdev205.zip,
> > etc... before we can proceed.
> 
> I wouldn't trigger a 2.05 rebuild just for this.  It just moves error
> handling for a bad usage from one spot to another, it doesn't make
> anything broken suddenly work.  If anyone passed a NULL to popen
> before, it failed.  If they pass NULL now, it fails.
> 
> If we have *other* reasons to rebuild 2.05, we can include it then.


I am not aware of any other reasons but it is Andris who contributes the djdev* stuff.  He should know.

Regards,
Juan M. Guerrero

- Raw text -