Mail Archives: djgpp/2015/08/29/13:15:11
Am Samstag, 29. August 2015 18:24:43 UTC+2 schrieb Andris Pavenis (andris DOT pavenis AT iki DOT fi) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]:
> On 08/29/2015 03:46 PM, Juan Manuel Guerrero (juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> > Am Samstag, 29. August 2015 12:27:59 UTC+2 schrieb Andris Pavenis (andris DOT pavenis AT iki DOT fi) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]:
> >> On 08/29/2015 12:38 PM, Juan Manuel Guerrero (juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> > [snip]
> >> About GCC versions:
> >> - 3.4.6, 4.7.4, 4.8.5, 4.9.3 and 5.2.0 should be in new current directory (that includes also
> >> gpc-3.4.6)
> >> All gcc builds older than from this year can go to ftp/deleted/...
> >>
> >> GMP, MPFR and MPC - perhaps only newest version should be kept
> >>
> >> I should also sometimes build binutils-2.25 RPMs for /pub/ftp/rpms
> >>
> >> Andris
> >
> > OFYI, this is the list of compilers that the script would hace copied to /current:
> > gcc323, gcc336, gcc346
> > gcc401, gcc412, gcc423, gcc432, gcc444, gcc453, gcc464, gcc474, gcc485, gcc493
> > gcc510, gcc520
> >
> > gpc323, gpc346
> >
> > Of course, gcc means all (ada*, gfor*, etc). If all these versions are still
> > required needs to be decide by someone else.
> >
> >
> gcc-3.2.3, gcc-3.3.6 - do not copy
> gpc-3.2.3 - do not copy
>
> gcc-3.4.6 - copy
> gpc-3.4.6 - copy
>
> gcc-4.X.Y where X < 7 - do not copyopy
>
> gcc-4.7.4, gcc-4.8.5, gcc-4.9.3 - to new current
>
> gcc-5.2.0 - to new current
>
> gcc-5.1.0 - no one has complained about regressions against it for gcc-5.2.0. . And it is not
> removed irrecoverably, so let's leave it out
>
> Andris
Do you remeber what binutils are required for those compiler versions. Currently the script would "delete" all binutils except the last port, hopping that it is good for all compilers.
Regards,
Juan M. Guerrero
- Raw text -