X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=WFNIcNuGZmo9Zxd3vgDTwhpRfjueWFqWbwph7HrAjXE=;
	b=oXTfiZSRjAP7DRC5voDUHQidnU500jg2rJa/RbMG5ZmW9NlNiCXDSWHmi99ICuabwi
	RhI8kkwkrAU/03c+uRWViHCh04mLNBwNYCF+vaxKlCAUfBaLDd3oX841Qojs9mekCAS4
	AAO5LCMNSV+uz2KygfBsbSxswwA1ETEi0FjcsqAtKGo8V0db/ahkRzyYRHnCVwB7HKxY
	U3cTlyp9bfbkydcyjl5gB2usfx8dSi5FS4RzaSZr/V+0Com5M+B2zpC+wUNFTFD+r+vs
	CEOh1bIEoA73O4mBkNCSzi9wlhTy4dmtjlWINA2/hvokCA3I+QQabdZw7jvCtdI8+E84
	4OUw==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.50.2.3 with SMTP id 3mr6493206igq.34.1435262164316; Thu, 25
	Jun 2015 12:56:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<83zj3nd137.fsf@gnu.org>
References:	<CAA2C=vAm46-SAj+CTVRmwP8ULLj14v_Bx0vwBuUiMYrjEED09g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83zj3nd137 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
Date:	Thu, 25 Jun 2015 22:56:04 +0300
Message-ID:	<CAA2C=vDa0M_A2pR9XLSRUYvGkheaGcH2HcJhV68WhW00T_v9kg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: wc204.txi and wc205.txi
From:	"Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com)" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 6/25/15, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
> I think "what changed in 2.05" means "since 2.04, whatever that is" to
> most people, so this would make sense.
>

On 6/25/15, Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) <djgpp AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 22:31:04 +0300
>> From: "Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com)" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
>>
>> As we state in the changelogs, djgpp-2.04 was never released, and to
>> most people, djgpp-2.04 is what beta/v2/ directory holds from 2003.
>> However, current wc204.txi contains many entries pointing to changes
>> from 2003 to this day.  I suggest that we move those entries to the
>> bottom of wc205.txi: a patch for it is attached. Thoughts?
>
> Of course.
>

Ok then, patch applied to HEAD and to v2_05_1

I don't think I made any mistake wrt texinfo, but please check
and correct as needed.

- Raw text -