X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Received:	by 10.50.142.8 with SMTP id rs8mr5363525igb.13.1434121379207;
	Fri, 12 Jun 2015 08:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received:	by 10.140.23.50 with SMTP id 47mr232958qgo.24.1434121379063; Fri,
	12 Jun 2015 08:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Date:	Fri, 12 Jun 2015 08:02:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<557AE57B.4090204@gmail.com>
Complaints-To:	groups-abuse AT google DOT com
Injection-Info:	glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.13.115.246;
	posting-account=p5rsXQoAAAB8KPnVlgg9E_vlm2dvVhfO
NNTP-Posting-Host:	65.13.115.246
References:	<201506091712 DOT t59HCPci004068 AT delorie DOT com> <557739E0 DOT 6070608 AT gmail DOT com>
	<CAB9Rao93XrKFBpUDnZdjCz+rEXHGOU2RNKdou2oMLJOk802LnA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<55775E64 DOT 2090901 AT gmail DOT com> <CAB9Rao-Njdr-CB=vqHnb+TVDmXu3eXqsB5CHB7V0kDwBEsM-WQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<5579ED42 DOT 6070309 AT gmail DOT com> <bedfae3f-2695-4253-8d9c-11c55703f8b5 AT googlegroups DOT com>
	<83616ts7gt DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <510f0bc7-7911-4d22-bfca-48716371ecb5 AT googlegroups DOT com>
	<83r3phqbhd DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <557AE57B DOT 4090204 AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent:	G2/1.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
Message-ID:	<9895c09c-0d26-4c3d-85fc-7157c27deae3@googlegroups.com>
Subject:	Re: DJGGP 2.05 upgrade problems.
From:	"rugxulo AT gmail DOT com" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Injection-Date:	Fri, 12 Jun 2015 15:02:59 +0000
Bytes:	2267
Lines:	14
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Hi,

On Friday, June 12, 2015 at 8:58:31 AM UTC-5, Frank Sapone (emoaddict15 AT hates DOT spam) wrote:
> >> Anyways, at the very least, such things (Find or File+Txt+Shl)
> >> should probably be recompiled with 2.05 *before* trying to debug
> >> anything.
> > I thought he already did.  Apologies if I misunderstood.
>
> I only grabbed the latest binutils and various friends from the 
> /beta/v2gnu section assuming these binaries were already made with 2.05

No, in fact, I don't think most things were recompiled (from old 2.04)
for 2.05 (yet??). I was surprised to see one or two things (allegedly)
using it. I didn't expect barely any of it to be rebuilt at all.
But now that somebody mentioned that, it might not be a bad idea.

- Raw text -