X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=boddHN7HPPXaDJcL5zBEQR6NvjY65k8AJWrSJiH8vzY=;
	b=DCshl8FTZCAaWN+5nwcTI3numFm8CE2K1ocm17KBCUwjQ9UwaZKFB87eQgjiccxfwZ
	6+mRZR3CQ9WSvQ8Ts0gMyD2HGcArTYCeSzaWFEZ1UqN7lvvztpcG2PqK1Dfx0BQP9xfq
	TAJfmz0s/MhYNy5xUjHWhGe6gUtTTGNbMtONIpSakX3H4LeNNfeEZrpZ60outwPse9OA
	ODaFEcXYrKNW+if7sXZR/JBe9feJDSyrICN/FOJAC63xQaJf/hD/68oei+ho2a1Wp/Ij
	2md9JSTJL40bXAY+g1eTlS/IuP6JzG3sQxZ+vMeKZzscEoAQpL6eiwtmOmgR2vIw8wVs
	dZDw==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.42.205.132 with SMTP id fq4mr11897528icb.33.1433530536757;
	Fri, 05 Jun 2015 11:55:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<mksolp$uta$1@dont-email.me>
References:	<55673F0B DOT 1090103 AT iki DOT fi>
	<83twuwwshg DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<55675040 DOT 9030008 AT iki DOT fi>
	<556F6E49 DOT 8010006 AT gmx DOT de>
	<556FCCDF DOT 7080005 AT iki DOT fi>
	<83bngvr0ef DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<557078B1 DOT 9040004 AT iki DOT fi>
	<201506041613 DOT t54GDT8m014488 AT delorie DOT com>
	<5570B1F7 DOT 1070509 AT iki DOT fi>
	<83pp5aprqw DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<mks4nl$1o8$1 AT speranza DOT aioe DOT org>
	<834mmmp7f0 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<mksolp$uta$1 AT dont-email DOT me>
Date:	Fri, 5 Jun 2015 21:55:36 +0300
Message-ID:	<CAA2C=vCh4Y6gZiAnss07rTdZjOjRsOWqXKEBKVLWOycxKV8xcA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: DJGPP v2.05: some thoughts
From:	"Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com)" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t55IteV8021121
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 6/5/15, Nick Bowler <nbowler AT draconx DOT ca> wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Jun 2015 17:16:19 +0300, Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) wrote:
>>> From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
>>> Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 12:29:43 +0000 (UTC)
>>>
>>> But, IIRC, C99 (or even perhaps C89) reserved any symbol starting with
>>> E.
>>
>> Where do you see such language in C99?  I don't see it, and neither do
>> I see it in C11.  But maybe I'm missing something, it's not like I've
>> read the entire document top to bottom.
>
> Names starting with E followed by a digit or an uppercase letter are
> reserved if <errno.h> is included.
>
> C99§7.5p4 Errors <errno.h>:
>
>   Additional macro definitions, beginning with E and a digit or E and
>   an uppercase letter, may also be specified by the implementation.
>
> This text was copied unchanged into C11.  I am quite sure it was also
> present in C89.
>

I don't see linux or mingw or cygwin limiting their errnos to strict ansi,
but djgpp.. I suggest that you guys remove those ifdefs.

- Raw text -