delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Message-ID: | <55673F0B.1090103@iki.fi> |
Date: | Thu, 28 May 2015 19:15:07 +0300 |
From: | "Andris Pavenis (andris DOT pavenis AT iki DOT fi)" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com> |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | "DJGPP List (E-mail)" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com> |
Subject: | DJGPP v2.05: some thoughts |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
I think it would be best to get DJGPP v2.05 actual release out soon enough. It would not be nice to repeat what happened with v2.04 again. Some questions that should be answered for that: - what critical problems we have what should be fixed for release - what we want in and what can wait Making release would include also moving out current stuff from pub/djgpp/current (one should be careful with source packages) and moving files from pub/djgpp/beta to current (possibly not all) and other related changes. There is danger of repeating history with v2.04 if begin to add too much new stuff or new changes. One possible new feature that comes into mind : - changes for more full support of wide characters have been around for a long time. We must decide whether we want to get it in v2.05 or we should wait after release. One of critical problems which as I think should be fixed if possible: - problems with DXE built with gcc-5.1.0 (I only tested 4.7.3 which is OK and 5.1.0). There could be additional issues of course. CVS branch for release should perhaps be created after getting possible new features in. This way it would be possible to continue development and avoid destabilizing 2.05 so release could be done in reasonable time. Andris
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |