X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=UbnbDl46xZ0ROus5IlcjtgoB+QyzapWsrpOLVTgtFbg=;
	b=ArGPVnBnqRFKX0qxCTFLKV7rh+blDAywfckCMgS0oG76rLc6dWioQgXkACXqllnzo9
	GvyFzqOpk8+PN0ZvZBsyzKaUjJowd3JogwsUYYI7QMnAVikZydtpPsj5Nq7/vZeiK+1f
	NgieVgtrn/+AvDLPgTatz3PCeMRaEqivIL9Lzz2D9mGvGnL7b5BN2cBgfsY0iVfoofQi
	iq+DbLG8FpXkeRdXWH8pDRTy+Kw6h6bmRMDXHkc0QP7Tn+HQo4xVLav8fadtWTxopl+O
	9Z6VVCcFPmTYYFea+McVuLLtdv4btGwxZL+XTcXqOvoDuo9li7uc0RFueOavSofgzsmz
	ShAQ==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.50.225.35 with SMTP id rh3mr13358207igc.29.1432407009944;
	Sat, 23 May 2015 11:50:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<201505231839.t4NId05i019194@envy.delorie.com>
References:	<201505042003 DOT t44K3odg011007 AT delorie DOT com>
	<CAA2C=vChvK1sAzRoqMGkgdCeuNbj--v6bzkcjeaT0T8dEk88Mg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201505231839 DOT t4NId05i019194 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Date:	Sat, 23 May 2015 21:50:09 +0300
Message-ID:	<CAA2C=vDmfEs+m=xvYTW=aiC8x8+FrZ4cYLBC1Kgox+qQNxLbuw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: ANNOUNCE: DJGPP 2.05 beta 1
From:	"Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com)" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 5/23/15, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
>> -        va_arg(argp, int);  /* discard */
>> +        _ulonglong = va_arg(argp, int);  /* discard */
>
> Can we use (void)va_arg(...) instead, so the compiler doesn't ever
> warn about (or try to optimize) an unused value?  Or was the warning
> about an uninitialized variable?
>

The warning was 'computed value not used' or something like it, which
happened with gcc2.95, not with gcc3.3+.

As far as I can follow, that _ulonglong thing exists only for this
purpose, i.e. to discard the value (see the ARG() macro in there).
I _think_ we can instead use (void), but didn't try it myself (I don't
know how it would behave with __builtin_va_arg) and only followed the
existing style.

- Raw text -