X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=uOhP+C6BVPNloTHWsSiHE2aGklNQqAQhcNHScTqdfS0=;
	b=ipDRPwoMvgh0A98ZyTx8dSXEV9VXWuMP5nz3rNMIkQVb05slBOdxPN78LfU3aV+T1U
	S04PwYTj2aCuPG4cYf0a4OVUmPmq6qdto2lb4XZz3dfWsP2mtvVJ3MEsJILdcoGZ58/9
	NxhguB/xLUqEYSIeIXAOtwb75UvJOMDF8PnSI8WqcOz62JoYwFJDOI8tPl6rPmSxd15Z
	qBJ9hYS8gui8z0KCysd25OTSDhwNxczZNWJ8Xd8ioxhrynlGrAk054eU4Pqp5BYwDTGN
	77YnHbChlwI8dsqQeqRnuIxEQ3vmxT6faoNlLnuoHS5YQPHeHt3GTjbEwHM2rXyrOUGi
	gw6A==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.50.43.227 with SMTP id z3mr7977701igl.22.1430916970794; Wed,
	06 May 2015 05:56:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<201505042003.t44K3odg011007@delorie.com>
References:	<201505042003 DOT t44K3odg011007 AT delorie DOT com>
Date:	Wed, 6 May 2015 15:56:10 +0300
Message-ID:	<CAA2C=vDbhnD6wA-nX_ApmRjmgk55=D6AsYPPXuYBtTOiYPZA8w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: ANNOUNCE: DJGPP 2.05 beta 1
From:	"Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com)" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 5/4/15, Andris Pavenis (andris DOT pavenis AT iki DOT fi)
<djgpp-announce AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> This is announcement of DJGPP 2.05 beta 1
>
> It has numerous changes since previous DJGPP 2.04 beta 1 release in 2003.
> (http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/mail-archives/browse.cgi?p=djgpp-announce/2003/12/06/22:18:05)
> Unfortunately DJGPP v2.04 was never released and old beta version slowly
> became almost unusable together with other newer DJGPP packages.
>
> More information about changes in DJGPP 2.05 beta 1 is available at
>
>      http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/doc/kb/
>
> both in sections about changes in 2.04 and 2.05. The same information is
> also
> available in file info/kb.inf in djdev205.zip
>
> It needs a lot of testing. Please test it if you have time and/or are
> interested in any of the above features. Any level of testing would be
> appreciated.

include/stdbool.h seems to have some confusion in it,
like defining its stuff, (to wrong things), when __cplusplus
is defined for one.  I suggest that  we match it to what gcc
itself provides.

--
O.S.

- Raw text -