X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=fPlWQM79QBiqIHvQDYKcEj/Hbop99x/XJjCka4P4KWQ=;
	b=JMXZ6wHlwY/E+wT0LOXU6iDr7OymxdIq8ERKu1TMRBztNDvZE+kMFREeQeMk5/zWHH
	h+uW5ix7vg1Rq6BNii2LyfTkyTzlPHE50xIlrrYFgREqGG+lyspUsbvv6+j3Dn5rNsfg
	E1qDIF/ueZH57QOYWxwuE94fk3hnfkZ9ZGAyZ8h5XprO0hFWiG9otfGMttCdsbY2UIyn
	93mIPoTO2NSbYVitP7WxYc7rgC/GWS508ZzbeIiQmv6+OsE7bIh9pa9az6vRJBgHjZAS
	rwsvCH6z1OBYpF75U0OXrN7S8QcHjg2xHneG+/3tc3XD76+AlAiXBNoSgHElBCOJyBcU
	p3aw==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.221.42.135 with SMTP id ty7mr17698980vcb.14.1402946643659;
	Mon, 16 Jun 2014 12:24:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<87bc0f93-3717-42f9-b8fe-bd00174c8e0f@googlegroups.com>
References:	<a121692e-95cf-4038-8cf2-9cfe19b3ff71 AT googlegroups DOT com>
	<4605f672-7a3f-43a4-8261-d50ad583f336 AT googlegroups DOT com>
	<CAB9Rao_9sGJ_w0h8xwg4YA62o+Dddn9Hy4b4AVhfQf8ZPAL6wg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<87bc0f93-3717-42f9-b8fe-bd00174c8e0f AT googlegroups DOT com>
Date:	Mon, 16 Jun 2014 12:24:03 -0700
Message-ID:	<CAB9Rao9KpRvdQO2C6WSpKwBna4=LoFkrk5xR8h-YvcG_MpOVhg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: std::thread, please?
From:	Louis Santillan <lpsantil AT gmail DOT com>
To:	"djgpp AT delorie DOT com" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

--001a113399745592f704fbf8f828
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I agree.  The one thing NetSurf does have going for it is that its
rendering engine is tracking (or will) the HTML5 spec.  Something Dillo or
Links haven't done.


On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Georg Potthast <dosusb AT googlemail DOT com>
wrote:

> I do not think the rendering of Netsurf is that much better than Dillo to
> make it worthwhile to port it to DOS. There is a big gap in quality between
> Dillo, Netsurf and Links versus Firefox and WebKit based browsers.
>
> Does anyone know if there is a Cairo port for DOS available?
>
> Georg
>
>
> Am Montag, 16. Juni 2014 17:52:07 UTC+2 schrieb Louis Santillan:
> > For DOS, I would expect NetSurf to be a better target since most of its
> dependencies are internal to the NetSurf project.  One major issue for most
> website, however, would be the lack of JS.
> >
> >
> >
> > http://www.netsurf-browser.org/
> >
>
>

--001a113399745592f704fbf8f828
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">I agree. =C2=A0The one thing NetSurf does have going for i=
t is that its rendering engine is tracking=C2=A0(or will)=C2=A0the HTML5 sp=
ec. =C2=A0Something Dillo or Links haven&#39;t done.</div><div class=3D"gma=
il_extra"><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Georg Potthast <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a h=
ref=3D"mailto:dosusb AT googlemail DOT com" target=3D"_blank">dosusb AT googlemail DOT co=
m</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margi=
n:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I do not think the rendering of Netsurf is that much better than Dillo to m=
ake it worthwhile to port it to DOS. There is a big gap in quality between =
Dillo, Netsurf and Links versus Firefox and WebKit based browsers.<br>
<br>
Does anyone know if there is a Cairo port for DOS available?<br>
<br>
Georg<br>
<br>
<br>
Am Montag, 16. Juni 2014 17:52:07 UTC+2 schrieb Louis Santillan:<br>
<div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5">&gt; For DOS, I would expect NetSur=
f to be a better target since most of its dependencies are internal to the =
NetSurf project. =C2=A0One major issue for most website, however, would be =
the lack of JS.<br>

&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; <a href=3D"http://www.netsurf-browser.org/" target=3D"_blank">http://w=
ww.netsurf-browser.org/</a><br>
&gt;<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>

--001a113399745592f704fbf8f828--

- Raw text -