| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f |
| X-Received: | by 10.182.125.4 with SMTP id mm4mr7989709obb.49.1402943505161; |
| Mon, 16 Jun 2014 11:31:45 -0700 (PDT) | |
| X-Received: | by 10.140.87.199 with SMTP id r65mr32100qgd.33.1402943505134; Mon, |
| 16 Jun 2014 11:31:45 -0700 (PDT) | |
| Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
| Date: | Mon, 16 Jun 2014 11:31:44 -0700 (PDT) |
| In-Reply-To: | <CAB9Rao_9sGJ_w0h8xwg4YA62o+Dddn9Hy4b4AVhfQf8ZPAL6wg@mail.gmail.com> |
| Complaints-To: | groups-abuse AT google DOT com |
| Injection-Info: | glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2.166.124.164; |
| posting-account=v5xbdQoAAAAOGc9Ccc-kLZyobvPlN3Qr | |
| NNTP-Posting-Host: | 2.166.124.164 |
| References: | <a121692e-95cf-4038-8cf2-9cfe19b3ff71 AT googlegroups DOT com> |
| <4605f672-7a3f-43a4-8261-d50ad583f336 AT googlegroups DOT com> <CAB9Rao_9sGJ_w0h8xwg4YA62o+Dddn9Hy4b4AVhfQf8ZPAL6wg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
| User-Agent: | G2/1.0 |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| Message-ID: | <87bc0f93-3717-42f9-b8fe-bd00174c8e0f@googlegroups.com> |
| Subject: | Re: std::thread, please? |
| From: | Georg Potthast <dosusb AT googlemail DOT com> |
| Injection-Date: | Mon, 16 Jun 2014 18:31:45 +0000 |
| Bytes: | 2027 |
| Lines: | 17 |
| To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
| X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id s5GIj1J9023950 |
| Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
I do not think the rendering of Netsurf is that much better than Dillo to make it worthwhile to port it to DOS. There is a big gap in quality between Dillo, Netsurf and Links versus Firefox and WebKit based browsers. Does anyone know if there is a Cairo port for DOS available? Georg Am Montag, 16. Juni 2014 17:52:07 UTC+2 schrieb Louis Santillan: > For DOS, I would expect NetSurf to be a better target since most of its dependencies are internal to the NetSurf project. One major issue for most website, however, would be the lack of JS. > > > > http://www.netsurf-browser.org/ >
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |