delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f |
X-Received: | by 10.236.128.195 with SMTP id f43mr12379874yhi.45.1400441888880; |
Sun, 18 May 2014 12:38:08 -0700 (PDT) | |
X-Received: | by 10.140.32.166 with SMTP id h35mr359qgh.23.1400441888527; Sun, |
18 May 2014 12:38:08 -0700 (PDT) | |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Date: | Sun, 18 May 2014 12:38:08 -0700 (PDT) |
In-Reply-To: | <5378E9BD.7070202@iki.fi> |
Complaints-To: | groups-abuse AT google DOT com |
Injection-Info: | glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=78.102.52.114; |
posting-account=Q0wMHAoAAADjYrghh94FTf6YnbpTqZgp | |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | 78.102.52.114 |
References: | <201404242126 DOT s3OLQHsS004032 AT delorie DOT com> <5869e34a-74a1-4a2d-a7be-2c12409b55f3 AT googlegroups DOT com> |
<40eb0e81-732e-4750-bfee-9f6dbd289143 AT googlegroups DOT com> <73f93cd2-a5b9-43f4-bd8a-1777af598a89 AT googlegroups DOT com> | |
<5378E9BD DOT 7070202 AT iki DOT fi> | |
User-Agent: | G2/1.0 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Message-ID: | <87eede45-ce02-4724-b8c3-edc4a753c25d@googlegroups.com> |
Subject: | Re: ANNOUNCE: DJGPP port of GCC-4.8.2 (DJGPP v2.04 only) |
From: | RayeR <glaux AT centrum DOT cz> |
Injection-Date: | Sun, 18 May 2014 19:38:08 +0000 |
Bytes: | 1691 |
Lines: | 5 |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> What optimization level did You use? I do not think that size can be reliably compared unless optimization level is -Os (optimize for size). Well I checked again and I had used -O2. So I retested with -Os and got much more comparable result, still file is a bit bigger from 4.9.0: before strip+UPX: 265728B vs 266240B after strip+UPX: 120016B vs 120464B
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |