delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Message-ID: | <5378E9BD.7070202@iki.fi> |
Date: | Sun, 18 May 2014 20:11:25 +0300 |
From: | Andris Pavenis <andris DOT pavenis AT iki DOT fi> |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: ANNOUNCE: DJGPP port of GCC-4.8.2 (DJGPP v2.04 only) |
References: | <201404242126 DOT s3OLQHsS004032 AT delorie DOT com> <5869e34a-74a1-4a2d-a7be-2c12409b55f3 AT googlegroups DOT com> <40eb0e81-732e-4750-bfee-9f6dbd289143 AT googlegroups DOT com> <73f93cd2-a5b9-43f4-bd8a-1777af598a89 AT googlegroups DOT com> |
In-Reply-To: | <73f93cd2-a5b9-43f4-bd8a-1777af598a89@googlegroups.com> |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
On 05/18/2014 07:04 PM, RayeR wrote: > I've been using djdev 2.04 for a long time, I know that 2.03 libc makes smaller exe. But in this case I'm comparing the result only after updating the compiler, anything else... (with previous gcc releases I sometimes even observed the exe is smaller a bit but not in this case 4.8.2->4.9) > > What optimization level did You use? I do not think that size can be reliably compared unless optimization level is -Os (optimize for size). Andris
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |