| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f |
| X-Received: | by 10.236.82.115 with SMTP id n79mr33779687yhe.35.1381796175942; |
| Mon, 14 Oct 2013 17:16:15 -0700 (PDT) | |
| X-Received: | by 10.50.136.133 with SMTP id qa5mr407987igb.4.1381796175730; Mon, |
| 14 Oct 2013 17:16:15 -0700 (PDT) | |
| Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
| Date: | Mon, 14 Oct 2013 17:16:15 -0700 (PDT) |
| In-Reply-To: | <201310100549.r9A5nXbp028237@delorie.com> |
| Complaints-To: | groups-abuse AT google DOT com |
| Injection-Info: | glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:7:f00:2ca:2c74:8761:63ea:136f; |
| posting-account=05hOMwoAAAB6R8xtiQKzEljSMzgOhVF1 | |
| NNTP-Posting-Host: | 2601:7:f00:2ca:2c74:8761:63ea:136f |
| References: | <l2g4gv$11km$1 AT adenine DOT netfront DOT net> <201310020453 DOT r924rSXt007186 AT delorie DOT com> |
| <87347957-e083-4d30-8f41-416847a8bf08 AT googlegroups DOT com> <201310051637 DOT r95GbMQZ005928 AT delorie DOT com> | |
| <90de5b80-9990-46b4-a382-be9e4cd44b9a AT googlegroups DOT com> <201310100549 DOT r9A5nXbp028237 AT delorie DOT com> | |
| User-Agent: | G2/1.0 |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| Message-ID: | <62cd9990-428a-4116-bce7-e585f41db91c@googlegroups.com> |
| Subject: | Re: Cygwin-to-DJGPP cross compiler |
| From: | Jim Michaels <jmichae3 AT yahoo DOT com> |
| Injection-Date: | Tue, 15 Oct 2013 00:16:15 +0000 |
| Bytes: | 2149 |
| Lines: | 25 |
| To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
| Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Wednesday, October 9, 2013 10:49:33 PM UTC-7, DJ Delorie wrote: > > > I've never heard of such a thing. Cygwin's compiler is gcc, just like > > > > DJGPP's. > > > > > > http://www.redhat.com/services/custom/cygwin/ > > > it's gcc, but it's somehow different. > > > > Heh. That's the group *I* work in. It's just gcc. The custom > > licensing is for the cygwin-specific runtime library, for customers > > who wish to not need to GPL their own applications just because > > they're built with cygwin. The custom support is just support. The > > license for the version of gcc in cygwin, any version of cygwin, is > > still plain GPL. I am confused - it's GPL but it's not GPL? can't be both.
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |