Mail Archives: djgpp/2012/09/07/22:00:06
On 09/07/2012 06:45 PM, rugxulo AT gmail DOT com wrote:
> On Friday, September 7, 2012 3:27:47 PM UTC-5, DMcCunney wrote:
>> I have an old (circa 2002) notebook I use as a test platform. It
>> multi-boots a couple of flavors of Linux, Win2K SP4 (Win2K runs
>> acceptably, WinXP does not.) and FreeDOS, and I got the DJGPP stuff
>> with FreeDOS.
>
> When you were recently mentioning old *nixes on old PCs, e.g. MKS in
> DOS, on the freedos-user mailing list, I forgot to mention DJGPP.
> Though no surprise you've heard of it. ;-)
It did come with FreeDOS, though I knew of it before that.
>> I have an assortment of info files on the machine, and looked around for
>> an info viewer I could use under Windows. There's a Gnuwin32 port of
>> info, but it has problems
>
> Both GNU Emacs and JED both have Win32 ports and can read Info files (and
> jump around properly between nodes, etc).
I have Emacs 24.1 on the machine, and it works in both a GUI session and
in a console window. But I don't want to run it just to view info
files. I'd prefer a stand-alone viewer. Salavador Tropea's Infview
(also distributed with FreeDOS) works, and it's what I use at the
moment, but I'd prefer a straight Info port to the TurboVision UI he uses.
> http://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/emacs/windows/
> http://www.jedsoft.org/cygwin/
And I'm trying to avoid Cygwin. (I have it elsewhere, and it works, but
I'd prefer to do without the POSIX compatibility layer.)
>> The DJGPP port of info runs in a console window under Win2K, but with a
>> quirk. I prefer an 90x50 console window, but DJGPP sets an 80x40 screen
>
> Yeah, I think the NTVDM always forces more normal sizes for various reasons
> (compatibility?).
It defaults to 80x25, but does not force it. If your DOS app will run
at a different size, you can configure a console window run from a
shortcut to open in the defined size.
> As for native DOS, I don't know what would happen, it might be hardcoded
> (you could check, but ...). Presumably it can be tweaked, but I'm not
> sure offhand. There I typically run 80x43 these days.
I'd like to know if it can be, without source-crawling.
______
Dennis
- Raw text -