X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
From:	Georg <dosusb AT googlemail DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	gprof output
Date:	Sat, 26 May 2012 11:34:01 -0700 (PDT)
Organization:	http://groups.google.com
Lines:	44
Message-ID:	<7822bb4a-1059-491a-8489-e1d9f3dbc501@l17g2000vbj.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	46.78.35.225
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	posting.google.com 1338057241 16909 127.0.0.1 (26 May 2012 18:34:01 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	groups-abuse AT google DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Sat, 26 May 2012 18:34:01 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To:	groups-abuse AT google DOT com
Injection-Info:	l17g2000vbj.googlegroups.com; posting-host=46.78.35.225; posting-account=v5xbdQoAAAAOGc9Ccc-kLZyobvPlN3Qr
User-Agent:	G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.9.1.4)
	Gecko/20091016 Firefox/3.5.4,gzip(gfe)
Bytes:	1975
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

I tried gprof to profile one of my programs. This is the ouput:

Flat
profile:

Each sample counts as 0.0555556
seconds.
  %   cumulative   self              self
total
 time   seconds   seconds    calls  Ts/call  Ts/call
name
 87.39     11.56    11.56
__dpmi_int
  3.78     12.06     0.50
__brk
  1.68     12.28     0.22
__dpmi_simulate_real_mod
  1.68     12.50     0.22
days_to_years
  1.68     12.72     0.22
timesub
  0.84     12.83     0.11
tmcomp
  0.42     12.89     0.06
GdMoveMouse
  0.42     12.94     0.06
MOU_Read
  0.42     13.00     0.06
TT_RunIns
  0.42     13.06     0.06
elapse_timeouts()
  0.42     13.11     0.06
__dj_movedata
  0.42     13.17     0.06
_int86
  0.42     13.22     0.06
tmnormalize
  0.00     13.22     0.00    23310     0.00     0.00
dStr_append_c

My question is: is it normal that a djgpp program uses 87% for
__dpmi_int? If not, what could be done to reduce this?

Georg

- Raw text -