delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f |
From: | Rugxulo <rugxulo AT gmail DOT com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: internal compiler error with c++11 features on 4.6.2 |
Date: | Sun, 27 Nov 2011 16:21:31 -0800 (PST) |
Organization: | http://groups.google.com |
Lines: | 38 |
Message-ID: | <44fc3a6e-50cd-4ff5-b69c-01363f6972e9@g7g2000vbd.googlegroups.com> |
References: | <64237354-a1d5-4c03-b446-b7de61297344 AT a2g2000prb DOT googlegroups DOT com> |
<bc5e54a1-40b5-4737-a497-e6b74454968d AT l23g2000pro DOT googlegroups DOT com> | |
<c6438915-77be-429d-b2a7-a4cacdb9f967 AT g7g2000vbd DOT googlegroups DOT com> <500942d9-99ce-4845-9c96-237bf349c27e AT g1g2000pri DOT googlegroups DOT com> | |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | 65.13.115.246 |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Trace: | posting.google.com 1322441378 20612 127.0.0.1 (28 Nov 2011 00:49:38 GMT) |
X-Complaints-To: | groups-abuse AT google DOT com |
NNTP-Posting-Date: | Mon, 28 Nov 2011 00:49:38 +0000 (UTC) |
Complaints-To: | groups-abuse AT google DOT com |
Injection-Info: | g7g2000vbd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.13.115.246; posting-account=p5rsXQoAAAB8KPnVlgg9E_vlm2dvVhfO |
User-Agent: | G2/1.0 |
X-Google-Web-Client: | true |
X-Google-Header-Order: | HUALESNKRC |
X-HTTP-UserAgent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/8.0,gzip(gfe) |
Bytes: | 3018 |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id pAS1024Q020442 |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Hi, On Nov 27, 6:00 pm, jimm <jmich DOT DOT DOT AT yahoo DOT com> wrote: > > I can't wait until they put boost in there with TR2. It's either wait or roll your own. Though lucky for you C++ is a very popular language with good support. So it shouldn't be too long. > I have been > waiting for decimal128 math and <string> compare that is case > insensitive - what were the designers thinking? ... > :-) "long long long int" ? :-) They probably think you can just use GMP lib, stricmp / strcasecmp, etc. (Or roll your own. Or use a different language.) > many needed improvements... initializer lists should have been done a > long time ago. G++ has always been pretty good and available since late '80s, I think, but even other people admit it only truly got great around 4.2. I think one guy [who?] then called it the "best in the world" at that point [citation needed]. As for adding more stuff, there will always be more to add. Sometimes you have to stop inventing and start stabilizing, implementing, etc. This is why C++11 only has stuff from circa 2006 or such [citation needed]. Bjarne Stroustrup probably doesn't want to sweat blood working on such standards for the rest of his life. It's already hard enough to implement (e.g. GCC uses a hand- written parser and not Bison [citation needed]). > I also think 128-bit integers should be available now, > since we have GUIDs and UUIDs. and GPT. > also, you can't represent SI and IEC units sufficiently without them. But what's the command to burn a Blu-Ray disc? Users demand it! ;-)
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |