X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=/QxibGXZID2Fn2BGqg1hG80mcw35cztu77mI01qVqEg=;
	b=Z31yoGDQmT+/1SRH53geV0fEitSyXtXKxOcg7E9OZjy+JGgQ5lQYt2Qp2qYI3hd048
	2AK7SHNMwrmh1iDD5GsbuNEvLvM0lK4yvbsh5RSAMRdTyO50VEluwhmPcMb+R6/snTZD
	N5sbv6ZiSjHo/JXG72u8YiagmIS0QvB7v7sDU=
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<4EA6EFEB.2000803@iki.fi>
References:	<4ce51722-c2fd-4fe0-8cb9-ebae498c3271 AT r1g2000yqm DOT googlegroups DOT com>
	<83k47tc9u2 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<CAA2C=vAn=NZYHMCc58HqfNZ=cdVbom-cE4ZZV1Pz=ziTT8EsNA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<4EA6EFEB DOT 2000803 AT iki DOT fi>
Date:	Wed, 26 Oct 2011 00:15:05 +0300
Message-ID:	<CAA2C=vD3U+AJy68J7HsJaMoYoTtaJth7vyJvUGsdCBvae58N4w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: _rdtsc(void) inline function in time.h - cause problem with
	multiple definition during linking
From:	Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz AT gmail DOT com>
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id p9PLF9JJ005409
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Andris Pavenis <andris DOT pavenis AT iki DOT fi> wrote:
> On 10/25/2011 07:33 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Eli Zaretskii<eliz AT gnu DOT org>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> From: RayeR<glaux AT centrum DOT cz>
>>>> Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 04:02:09 -0700 (PDT)
>>>>
>>>> during compiling large sources I run into troubles with multiple
>>>> _rdtsc(void) definition during linking. The problem is caused when in
>>>> 1st stage is compiled a library that includes time.h and then in 2nd
>>>> stage is compiled main app that also includes time.h Because there is
>>>> _rdtsc() code already in library linker got confused what to use.
>>>>
>>>> Do you think it should be fixed DJGPP time.h header to redefine
>>>>
>>>> extern __inline__ unsigned long long
>>>> _rdtsc(void)
>>>> {
>>>>   unsigned long long result;
>>>>   __asm__ __volatile__ ("rdtsc" : "=A"(result) );
>>>>   return result;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> to static?
>>>
>>> Can you show the error messages you get?
>>>
>>> It is strange that you should get any errors at all: an inline
>>> function is like a macro, it disappears without a trace in the
>>> compiled object code, so the linker should not complain, because
>>> there's no symbol corresponding to the function for it to see any
>>> multiple definitions.  There simply should not be any definition at
>>> all.
>>>
>>> Did you perhaps disable inlining, or compiled with some headers that
>>> define away __inline__?
>>>
>>
>> BTW, is the issue with 2.03 or 2.04?  IIRC, 2.04 had fix applied for this.
>
> Yes. But the fix is newer than the beta version from djgpp/beta/v2 as far as
> I remember
>
> Perhaps it could be good time to release a new beta sometime.
>

That is a good idea.  I've been using the snapshot from 2011-10-02
with success.  I can provide packages (cross-built on linux) if required.

> Andris
>
>

--
O.S.

- Raw text -