Mail Archives: djgpp/2011/09/26/16:19:06
Am Montag, 26. September 2011 schrieb Ozkan Sezer:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 1:29 AM, Juan Manuel Guerrero
> <juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de> wrote:
> > OFYI, I have produced a second version of the patch presented the last time.
> > This time the patch shall fix the same issues but for djdev 2.03.
> >
> > Suggestions, objections, comments are welcome.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Juan M. Guerrero
> >
>
> When I first apply my v2.03 compilability patch (see here under the
> "build v2.03 tree using gcc3x and gcc4x" thread:
> http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/mail-archives/browse.cgi?p=djgpp-workers/2011/09/17/11:39:42
> )
> ... then your patch doesn't apply, which makes it less useful because
> v2.03 tree is not compilable with the newish gcc. I can wiggle it
> to apply of course, so thanks for taking time to do this.
Sorry for that, but my intention never was to support the fixing of djdev203
sources out-of-the-box. The patch shows how I fixed those 2.03 files that I will
include in the next version of libsupp to replace the originals from the libc.a
version of djdev 2.03. As you have noted, they are not a drop-in replacement
for the 2.03 repository branch that can no longer be compiled with current
compiler versions.
> On another note, is any versions of your changes going in
> any time soon?
As soon as I have finished my last fixes and if no one opposes nor finds more
issues I think it could be commited. May be this will take a week more.
Regards,
Juan M. Guerrero
- Raw text -