delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=gamma; | |
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to | |
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; | |
bh=bGfzgAiu0FpJRNCSJHU5splxBnNeFtn7WlqhZWjfSME=; | |
b=GMRedR1NGmQjbvfEILYd454egOFmfNFnbQ7N75W7lkU0uwVi9KvgB1AcsxaKrfKE0W | |
xWJ1vhLBz/Fpfla+K69tJwLKuOeBK4M7tqFNpOJUZXy8RY3QM7SS/4vHv1W3w7U1LvFn | |
C8IkF6cSuYSyK0yMl8sQ5wc/S9IxJoKBvRGlE= | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <ab129657-7f07-425e-861e-b4abeb0319e4@g31g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> |
References: | <201109171356 DOT 53360 DOT juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de> |
<CAA2C=vD-Lzrt2z=gkkQcrgmssdh6F7vgU_kwVgu6o9iPGykMJQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<2dc464f3-6f8c-4139-8dcb-0719e25116bf AT i39g2000yqn DOT googlegroups DOT com> | |
<CAA2C=vAphY=pug=oSg-5Az05kZybY0NUYg6SS8d9xKL6f3AwRA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<ab129657-7f07-425e-861e-b4abeb0319e4 AT g31g2000yqh DOT googlegroups DOT com> | |
Date: | Mon, 19 Sep 2011 00:03:07 +0300 |
Message-ID: | <CAA2C=vAZ0r0g55PpGpJWL3CMhAX7bqGFivdi6fY0NgjPjqwrVw@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: Isues concerning the INT 21 Windows95 - LONG FILENAME FUNCTIONS |
(0x71XX) implementation. | |
From: | Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz AT gmail DOT com> |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id p8IL3Csu030571 |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Rugxulo <rugxulo AT gmail DOT com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sep 17, 2:23 pm, Ozkan Sezer <seze DOT DOT DOT AT gmail DOT com> wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Rugxulo <rugx DOT DOT DOT AT gmail DOT com> wrote: >> >> > You mean Hammer of Thyrion? I assume this means you rebuilt it. >> >> >http://uhexen2.sourceforge.net/ >> >> Yep. I'm the main developer of it. > > Ah, okay. Yeah, I've tested that off and on, at least the demo, for > the past year or so. Works quite well. Nice work. (Though you're using > old CWSDPMI versions, dunno why, latest is r7.) I don't know how tested that one is, so I decided to stay safe and use r5+latest updates to it > > EDIT: Actually, just upgraded from rc2 to rc5 (Win64) and played a bit > and got a crash. :-> > Actually 1.5.0-final is about to be released in a day or two. For the packages intended for release, but see here: http://uhexen2.sourceforge.net/tmp/ If you still have a crash, I'd like to have a detailed bug report about it. >> >> <rant> >> >> With doslfn loaded, the hard disk scratching was unbearable to >> >> hear. Living with conventional dos is a bliss.. >> >> </rant> > > Don't forget you can use a RAM disk. ;-) > Heh. Well, without RAM disk and without DOSLFN it is just OK -- O.S.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |