X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=Ei24WnAkTGaBLjzSzcKCDG4vtUhAXcxA80bPtJCgQME=;
	b=LL/5/H/8Sl2feVnm8BH9r4L712aKEm+H9O+VlwNrqb/Px3oB86ruvprcMAuJX/ayZT
	ZCtMJxUMNWzfZibO6fmTUzutAi+H59CA3Aqli0OrRfexHZWhmJPt01sMD4lJYFPQoyws
	RqRCHumFRRC/3Arqv4y35vRpvBfhycDgNscKI=
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<8362ktx1te.fsf@gnu.org>
References:	<201109101340 DOT 47663 DOT juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de>
	<83vct04a4x DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<CAA2C=vBkMD34-KBtp0hMbQ3Ppk8gavXJjkddDq_2hjzUA7PYHA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<E1R49TJ-000696-92 AT fencepost DOT gnu DOT org>
	<CAA2C=vDWWQX7AjDMDp+Qo-8yzzSP8GopF9tkrDjYBHFn_G3EnA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<8362ktx1te DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
Date:	Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:48:57 +0300
Message-ID:	<CAA2C=vDv_JPPDo0oe9_kPmst3ndaPaaaEhwpLr3o1-zSM6h7bA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: Isues concerning the INT 21 Windows95 - LONG FILENAME FUNCTIONS
	(0x71XX) implementation.
From:	Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz AT gmail DOT com>
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id p8FFn08h030788
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT gnu DOT org> wrote:
>> Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:33:20 +0300
>> From: Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz AT gmail DOT com>
>>
>> 2. any fixes went into 2.04 which I have trouble handling because
>> 2.03 branch is very much not compilable by gcc-3+.
>
> You mean, 2.04 has trouble being compiled with GCC 3.x, right?
> Because I know of no problems with compiling v2.03 with GCC 3.

No, I really meant 2.03: checked out v2_03_1 branch from cvs,
compilation fails at many places using gcc 3.3.6

>
>> AFAIU, no LFN stuff were in 2.03, yes?
>
> What do you mean by "no LFN stuff"?  DJGPP supports LFN since v2.02 if
> not before that.
>

I meant 0x71XX usage regarding the main topic of this thread.

>> If yes that means 2.03 knows nothing about LFN stuff and _can_
>> result in FS corruption??
>
> No.  I use v2.03 on Windows for the past 10 years, 6 years out of them
> on XP, and I have yet to see any sign of such problems.
>

That's good to know.

--
O.S.

- Raw text -