X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=f9/RLtyxX2YlU/D8Qi5O1t5Q04vubpOkOfiX8jgeNUI=;
	b=mhIgVDJNlgP3KSmbUCL2YaiiBLMePRxviK1C6iRxkMKva2Zu76+9pHW5aVmI4XX+wZ
	lURf76wEi7X9RdQQs/Rwkm+mVXG2ihKOW0sUwwNtpJh9a50SxNGn8eQCNH3N0P/X0tiE
	LWtUVQke05ZY7uDBCCNoXFL8rNqPw3COMhLWk=
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<lNOdnV5dhsOUAvzTnZ2dnUVZ_gKdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
References:	<201108310027 DOT 22056 DOT juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de>
	<E1Qye2f-0005Iu-TI AT fencepost DOT gnu DOT org>
	<201108312117 DOT 54522 DOT juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de>
	<j3op85$567$1 AT speranza DOT aioe DOT org>
	<038ae4ff-44f2-4ad2-b806-a6ed9b6085a2 AT o9g2000vbo DOT googlegroups DOT com>
	<83zkincty6 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<e5b1540d-525e-48b9-9b15-59e9ba823a23 AT s2g2000vby DOT googlegroups DOT com>
	<CAA2C=vA1fwBnmJh-L0g4Rw+BdoSD4VBXGd2WP-W5dws7KGFA-Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83pqjiuccr DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<lNOdnV5dhsOUAvzTnZ2dnUVZ_gKdnZ2d AT earthlink DOT com>
Date:	Sat, 3 Sep 2011 11:23:06 +0300
Message-ID:	<CAA2C=vB1pkVA1kTz7AtO=OfbEWj13=yXyaqOd_sCS7TYxpzZyA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: gcc difficulties on MSDOS 6.22 with LFN driver installed
From:	Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz AT gmail DOT com>
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id p838kOPF016731
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Charles Sandmann <cwsdpmi AT earthlink DOT net> wrote:
> I think these are related to the ability of some systems to support
> files > 2GB in size, which are not directly LFN related.  There needs
> to be a different test in the code for this handling before it is used
> (requires LFN, but LFN does not necessarily provide big file support).
> This was one of the issues that kept V2.04 in beta.

IIUC, the error would show itself if the accessed file is really >= 2GB,
however Juan's test was simply running gcc to compile a hello.c and I
don't think that gcc is trying to access any such large file in the process.
Am I missing something?

--
O.S.

- Raw text -