delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=gamma; | |
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to | |
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; | |
bh=f9/RLtyxX2YlU/D8Qi5O1t5Q04vubpOkOfiX8jgeNUI=; | |
b=mhIgVDJNlgP3KSmbUCL2YaiiBLMePRxviK1C6iRxkMKva2Zu76+9pHW5aVmI4XX+wZ | |
lURf76wEi7X9RdQQs/Rwkm+mVXG2ihKOW0sUwwNtpJh9a50SxNGn8eQCNH3N0P/X0tiE | |
LWtUVQke05ZY7uDBCCNoXFL8rNqPw3COMhLWk= | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <lNOdnV5dhsOUAvzTnZ2dnUVZ_gKdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
References: | <201108310027 DOT 22056 DOT juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de> |
<E1Qye2f-0005Iu-TI AT fencepost DOT gnu DOT org> | |
<201108312117 DOT 54522 DOT juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de> | |
<j3op85$567$1 AT speranza DOT aioe DOT org> | |
<038ae4ff-44f2-4ad2-b806-a6ed9b6085a2 AT o9g2000vbo DOT googlegroups DOT com> | |
<83zkincty6 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> | |
<e5b1540d-525e-48b9-9b15-59e9ba823a23 AT s2g2000vby DOT googlegroups DOT com> | |
<CAA2C=vA1fwBnmJh-L0g4Rw+BdoSD4VBXGd2WP-W5dws7KGFA-Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<83pqjiuccr DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> | |
<lNOdnV5dhsOUAvzTnZ2dnUVZ_gKdnZ2d AT earthlink DOT com> | |
Date: | Sat, 3 Sep 2011 11:23:06 +0300 |
Message-ID: | <CAA2C=vB1pkVA1kTz7AtO=OfbEWj13=yXyaqOd_sCS7TYxpzZyA@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: gcc difficulties on MSDOS 6.22 with LFN driver installed |
From: | Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz AT gmail DOT com> |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id p838kOPF016731 |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Charles Sandmann <cwsdpmi AT earthlink DOT net> wrote: > I think these are related to the ability of some systems to support > files > 2GB in size, which are not directly LFN related. There needs > to be a different test in the code for this handling before it is used > (requires LFN, but LFN does not necessarily provide big file support). > This was one of the issues that kept V2.04 in beta. IIUC, the error would show itself if the accessed file is really >= 2GB, however Juan's test was simply running gcc to compile a hello.c and I don't think that gcc is trying to access any such large file in the process. Am I missing something? -- O.S.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |